Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Goodnight v. Goodnight, 735 So. 2d 809.

23 citing documents.

Derek H. Tucker v. Renate Tucker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 5/5/99), Launey v. Launey, 98-849 (La.App.
Larry Walter Baxley v. Paulette D. Coburn Baxley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Eddie Rusk v. Delores Rusk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Rusk v. Rusk 102 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Jeffery Daniel Smith v. Ginger Lemaire Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/5/99), ( (La.App.
Seth Scarborough v. Dora Maria Ybanez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Scarborough v. YBANEZ 30 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Smith v. Smith 31 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Blane Guillory v. Rachel Cefalu Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/5/99), ( (La.App.
Guillory v. Guillory 7 So. 3d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/5/99), ( (La.App.
Mary Katherine Milton Thompson v. Neil Jerome Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/5/99), (quoting Faltynowicz v. Faltynowicz, 30,606, p.6 (La.
Thompson v. Thompson 980 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/5/99), (quoting Faltynowicz v. Faltynowicz, 30,606, p.6 (La.
Briggitte Yvette Ardoin v. Brian Craig Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Ardoin v. Ardoin 934 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Mizell v. Mizell 920 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
3d Cir.5/5/99), , declared, in part: Factors to consider in determining whether an ex-spouse is in need of alimony include her income, means, earning *933 capacity, assets, the liquidity of the assets, her financial obligations, her health and age and any other circumstances deemed relevant by the court.
Moore v. Moore 866 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Timothy Methias Floyd v. Mary Ann Schlotterbeck Floyd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/5/99), ( (La.App.
Floyd v. Floyd 861 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/5/99), , ( (La.App.
Anderson v. Anderson 839 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/5/99); , quoting Faltynowicz v. Faltynowicz, 30,605, p. 6 (La.App.
Knowles v. Knowles 827 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Jones v. Jones 804 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
He cites Goodnight v. Goodnight, 98-1892 (La.App.3d 5/5/99), , decided under the prior version of La.
Bowes v. Bowes 798 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Carr v. Carr 756 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
3d Cir.5/5/99), ; Mayes v. Mayes, 98-2228 (La.App.