Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Clinic v. Patin's Tire Service, 731 So. 2d 525.

13 citing documents.

Burgess v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 187 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 3 Cir. 5/5/99), , on the basis that the above rationale did not apply to a pharmacist; whereas^ the rationale did apply to the provider of an MRI, which was the issue in Patin’s. 8 In making that distinction, the Third Circuit in Sigler reasoned as follows: Sigler takes issue with Dresser Rand’s reason for its action and asserts that
Downs v. Chateau Living Center 167 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Marc Bordelon v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Bordelon v. Lafayette Consolidated Government 149 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Judy Davis v. State, Thru Dotd, Office of Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wilton Gautreaux v. K.A.S. Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 5/5/99), wherein the court said: Prince chose his treating physician, Dr. Phillips, as allowed by La.R.S.
Gautreaux v. K.A.S. Construction, LLC 923 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 5/5/99), , wherein the court said: Prince chose his treating physician, Dr. Phillips, as allowed by La.R.S.
Terry Sigler v. Dressers rand/coastal Chemical La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Sigler v. Rand 896 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Ware v. Allen Parish School Bd. 854 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/5/99) , , which gives the choice of a diagnostic facility to the employee, rather than the employer, the workers' compensation judge, nevertheless, overruled her objection, stating, "We'll note your objection for the record but an FCE is not a medical examination per se to determine the condition of the claimant, nor the need
Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum 805 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Louisiana Clinic v. Patin's Tire Service 757 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000