Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bieber-Guillory v. Aswell, 723 So. 2d 1145.

22 citing documents.

Fia Card Services, N.A. (Bank of America) v. Jefferson Joseph Moss, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 12/30/98), (quoting Broussard v. Guilbeaux, 93-1353 (La.App.
Lafayette General Medical Center,inc. v. Richard Hill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 12/30/98), (quoting Broussard v. Guilbeaux, 93–1353, p. 4 (La.App.
Arc Industries, L.L.C. v. William H. Nungesser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
is analogous to an award of damages, the record must clearly reveal the trial court abused its discretion before we will disturb the award.” Bieber- 22 Guillory v. Aswell, 98-559, p. 10 (La.App 3 Cir. 12/30/98)
Crescent City Cabinets & Flooring, L.L.C. v. Grace Tama Development Co. 203 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Cecil Mitchell Adrian v. Kathy Lynn Adrian La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/98), -50, wherein, citing La.Civ.Code art. 1927,3 we held that “[w]hen there is no meeting of the minds between the parties, there is no consent, thus no enforceable 3 Louisiana Civil Code Article 1927, provides, in pertinent part, that “[a] contract is formed by the consent of the parties establish
Adrian v. Adrian 178 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/98), *301 1149-50 , wherein, citing La.Civ.Code art. 1927, 3 we held that “[wjhen there is no meeting of the minds between the parties, there is no consent, thus no enforceable | ^contract.” Our reading of the January 4, 2011 transcript wherein the parties through their attorneys expressed their desire to enter into a “gl
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Michael Dole, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/98), we discussed recovery under the doctrine of action de in rem verso or unjust enrichment.
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Dole 165 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/30/98) , , we discussed recovery under the doctrine of action de in rem verso or unjust enrichment.
Superior Shipyard & Fabrication v. M & T Oceanographic Research, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Explained Ville Platte Concrete Service, Inc. v. Joshua Paul Manuel, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/30/98), -50 (emphasis added) we explained the evidentiary showing a plaintiff must make in proving a right to recovery on an open account and further explained that: This required showing by the plaintiff presupposes the existence of an enforceable contract between the parties.
Explained E. Smith Plumbing, Inc. v. Manuel 88 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/30/98), -50 (emphasis added) we explained the evidentiary showing a plaintiff must make in proving a right to recovery on an open account and further explained that: This required showing by the plaintiff presupposes the existence of an enforceable contract between the parties.
Louisiana Alligator Wholesale, Inc. v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale Distributors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Louisiana Alligator Wholesale, Inc. v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale Distributors, Inc. 981 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Gregory Kent Moroux v. Andre F. Toce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Moroux v. Toce 943 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir. 12/30/98), .
Overton v. Shell Oil Co. 937 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Lumber Investors, LLC D/B/A Martin Bldg Materials v. Herman Humphries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Lumber Investors, LLC v. Humphries 929 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Vintage Wings & Things, LLC v. Toce & Daiy, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Vintage Wings & Things, LLC v. Toce & Daiy, LLC 886 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
App. 3 Cir. 12/30/98), .
Walker, Tooke & Lyons, LLP v. Sapp 862 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
3d Cir.12/30/98), ; (La.App.
Cajun Concrete Services, Inc. v. J. Caldarera & Co. 759 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
3 Cir.12/30/98), , citing Rhodes v. Collier, 215 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by