Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Courville v. City of Lake Charles, 720 So. 2d 789.
-
Weaver v. City of Shreveport
261 So. 3d 1079
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 3 Cir. 10/28/98), , 795.
- Patricia Bell v. Carencro Nursing Home, Inc., D/B/A Evangeline Oaks Guest House La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- Bell v. Carencro Nursing Home, Inc. 202 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Carl Jones, Sr. v. Centerpoint Energy Entex La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex 66 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
Sanchez v. CANEZARO
11 So. 3d 1246
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 3 Cir. 10/28/98), .
-
Brooks v. City of Jennings
944 So. 2d 768
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 10/28/98) , ; Jones v. Congemi, 01-1345, 02-148, 02-149 (La.App.
-
Kathi Brooks v. City of Jennings
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 10/28/98), Jones v. 19 Congemi, 01-1345, 02-148, 02-149 (La.App.
- Istre v. Meche 931 So. 2d 361 La. 2006
- Istre v. Meche 916 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Russell Paulette Lebouef Istre v. Daniel Meche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Althea Wellman, Tutrix of Jared L. Samuel v. Johnny M. Evans, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 10/28/98), this court addressed the duty owed by police officers when the plaintiff had earlier advised police that his wife had taken the family vehicle and was in search of illegal drugs.
-
Wellman v. Evans
876 So. 2d 954
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 10/28/98) , , this court addressed the duty owed by police officers when the plaintiff had earlier advised police that his wife had taken the family vehicle and was in search of illegal drugs.
- Southern Ingenuity, Inc. v. Benjamin 854 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Frazier v. Zapata Protein USA, Inc. 832 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
-
Explained
LaSalle v. Wilson Trailer Co.
787 So. 2d 1173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 10/28/98) ; , a trial court considering a motion for involuntary dismissal must evaluate all evidence without any special inferences in favor of the nonmov-ing party and determine whether the non-moving party has failed to establish proof by a preponderance of the evidence.