DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bernard, 734 So. 2d 687.

20 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Thibodeaux 190 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. James E. Ramsdell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Ramsdell 47 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Julian, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 2/3/99), (citations omitted), this court stated, “It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness’s testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence.” Accordingly, Agent
  • State v. Julian 25 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 2/3/99), (citations omitted), this court stated, "It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness's testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence."
  • State v. Stevens 978 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    *541 3 Cir. 2/3/99), (citations omitted), this court stated, "It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness's testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence."
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Joseph Stevens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/3/99), (citations omitted), this court stated, “It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness’s testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence.” The Defendant’s statement to
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/3/99), this court stated: It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness’s testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence.
  • State v. Carmouche 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/3/99) , , this court stated: It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness's testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence.
  • State in the Interest of S. R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 2/3/99), (citations omitted), this court addressed this issue stating: It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness’s testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict wit
  • State of Louisiana v. Mitchell Pat Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Mayeux 949 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Calvin Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 2/3/99), this court stated: It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness’s testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with
  • State v. Ware 929 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 2/3/99) , , this court stated: It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness's testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence.
  • State v. Holley 799 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 2/3/99) ; , a panel of this court stated: The testimony of one witness, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support the requisite factual conclusion in the absence of internal contradictions or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence.
  • State v. Charles 787 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 2/3/99) ; , "that a jury may rely on a single witness's testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence."
  • State v. Clark 780 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 2/3/99); ; State v. Guidry, 94-596 (La.App.
  • State v. Callegari 773 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 2/3/99); , 691 this court explained: It is well settled in Louisiana law that a jury may rely on a single witness’s testimony to establish a factual element required to prove guilt, provided there is no internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence.
  • State v. Judge 758 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000