DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dual Drilling Co. v. MILLS EQUIPMENT, INC., 721 So. 2d 853.

40 citing documents.

  • Jan Taylor and Jessica Tranette Taylor v. Orr Motors of Shreveport, D/B/A Orr Nissan La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    Inv., Inc., 98-343 (12/1/98), defined conversion as the following: A conversion is committed when any of the following occurs: 1) possession is acquired in an unauthorized manner; 2) the chattel is removed from one place to another with the intent to exercise control over it; 3) possession of the chattel is transfe
  • Barges Unlimited Inc. and Cornelius J. Tabor, Jr. v. Morgan City Stevendores, LLC, Babin Marine, LLC, Roland Shapley … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
  • Tamekia Capers v. NorthPro Properties Management, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
  • Doris M. Wellan, PhD. v. Comfort Innovations, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • Derome A. Seals v. Robert L. Lucien and Quality MacHinery, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
  • Agrifund, LLC v. Radar Ridge Planting Co., Inc. and Thomas A. Dickerson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    12/1/98), Boyer v. Kokkinis, 51,598 (La.
  • Alvin J. Chaisson v. Colby Garrett Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    12/1/98), -57 (footnotes omitted).
  • Darrell Eugene Watts, Jr. v. Mary Begnaud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    12/1/98), MCI Commc’ns Servs., Inc. v. Hagan, 11-1039 (La.
  • Fenner v. Schley 246 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    12/1/98), ; Noel v. Landry , (La.
  • Bihm v. Deca Systems, Inc. 226 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co. 219 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Dileo v. Horn 189 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment, 98-343 c/w 98-356 (La.12/1/98), .
  • David R. Rabalais v. Jack Gardner's Ten Minute Oil Change, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    12/1/98), (citing Frank L. Maraist & Thomas C. Galligan, Louisiana Tort Law § 1-2, at 3 (1996 & Supp.1998)).
  • Melerine v. O'Connor 135 So. 3d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343, pp. 4-6 (La.12/1/98), -57 , the Court addressed the concept of conversion, in pertinent part: The Civil Code itself does not identify causes of action for “conversion.” However, causes of action for conversion have been inferred from the Codal articles providing that the right of ownership, possession, and enjoyment of movables [is] pr
  • Commercial Flooring & Mini Blinds, Inc. v. Edenfield 138 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Invest *39 ments, Inc., 98-0343 (La.12/1/98), , Thus, the conversion action is predicated on the fault of the defendant and directed to the recovery of the goods or, in the alternative, the plaintiff may demand compensation.
  • Kaylin Renee Celestine, Etc. v. Brenda Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    12/1/98), (footnotes omitted).
  • Funderburg v. Superior Energy Services, Inc. 83 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Investments, Inc., 98-0343, 98-0356 (La.12/1/98), .
  • MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. v. Hagan 74 So. 3d 1148 La. 2011
    Civ.Code art. 2315(A) provides that “[e]very act whatever of man that causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” As we noted in Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343 (La.12/1/98), , in rejecting the adoption of the strict liability remedy of the common law action of conversion, “[o]ur civilian remedies amply protect personal and real rights in movable property and should not be obscured by an application of common law ...
  • Mille S. McFadden v. Import One, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    12/1/98), defined conversion as the following (emphasis added): A conversion is committed when any of the following occurs: 1) possession is acquired in an unauthorized manner; 2) the chattel is removed from one place to another with the intent to exercise control over it; 3) possession of the ch
  • McFadden v. Import One, Inc. 56 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    *1217 The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-843, pp. 4-5 (La.12/1/98), , defined conversion as the following (emphasis added): A conversion is committed when any of the following occurs: 1) possession is acquired in an unauthorized manner; 2) the chattel is removed from one place to another with the intent to exercise control over it; 3) possession of the chattel is transferred with
  • New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Foundation, Inc. v. Kirksey 40 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    We now address the correctness of the trial court’s finding that the rebates were “wrongfully converted.” The Civil Code itself does not identify causes of action for “conversion.” Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), .
  • EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SEWERAGE COMMISSION v. Banks 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Louisiana Health Care Group, Inc. v. Allegiance Health Management, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    12/1/98), Allegiance defines conversion as “a distinct act of dominion wrongfully exerted over another’s property in denial of or inconsistent with the owner’s rights therein.” The quote by Allegiance is not found in Dual Drilling.
  • Louisiana Health Care Group, Inc. v. Allegiance Health Management, Inc. 32 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Ostensibly quoting Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343 (La.12/1/98), , 1 Allegiance defines conversion as “a distinct act of dominion wrongfully exerted over another’s property in denial *1143 of or inconsistent with the owner’s rights therein.” The quote by Allegiance is not found in Dual Drilling.
  • Gallant Investments, Ltd. v. Illinois Central Railroad 7 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Investments, Inc., 98-0343, 98-0356, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    12/1/98), (citing FRANK L. MARAIST & THOMAS C. GALLIGAN, LOUISIANA TORT LAW § 1-2, at 3 (1996 & Supp.1998)).
  • Glod v. Baker 998 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Invs., Inc., 98-343, pp. 4-5 (La.12/1/98), ( citing FRANK L. MARAIST & THOMAS C. GALLIGAN, LOUISIANA TORT LAW § 1-2, at 3 (1996 & Supp.1998)).
  • Joyner v. Liprie 983 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Joyner cites Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343 (La.12/1/98), and Gibbs v. Harris, 35,239 (La.App.
  • Boykins v. Boykins 984 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Duel[Dual] Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc.
  • Jefferson v. Crowell 956 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/01/98), .
  • II Fire Records, L.L.C. v. Clouden 951 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    In Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343, 98-0356 (La.12/1/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the tort of conversion.
  • Snow v. Weyant 923 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Dual Drilling Company v. Mills Equipment, 98-0343, pp. 3-4 (La.12/1/98), -58 .
  • Fg Bruschweiler (Antiques) v. Gba 860 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Dual Drilling Co., v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Clark v. Clarendon Ins. Co. 841 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 1/7/98) ; , rev'd on other grounds, 98-343, 98-356 (La.12/1/98); ; Landry v. St.
  • Sheridon v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 838 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Initially, we note that a conversion action “is grounded on the unlawful *889 interference with the ownership or possession of a movable.” Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-343, p. 5 (La.12/1/98); .
  • Gibbs v. Harris 799 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Dual Drilling Company v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Crawford v. Reagan 779 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343 (La.12/01/98), .
  • Girgis v. Macaluso Realty Co. 778 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 1/07/98) , , rev’d on other grounds, 98-0343, 98-0356 (La.12/01/98), .
  • Johnson v. Hardy 756 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    B. Principles of Civilian Conversion In Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment Investments, Inc., 98-0343, pp. 4-5 (La.12/1/98), , the Supreme Court addressed the concept of civilian conversion, in pertinent part, as follows: The Civil Code itself does not identify causes of action for "conversion."
  • Dixie Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Pitre 751 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Dual Drilling Co. v. Mills Equipment, 98-0343, 98-0356 (La.12/1/98), .