DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kelly v. CNA Ins. Co., 729 So. 2d 1033.

27 citing documents.

  • Adams v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 142 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    Co., 98-454 (La.3/12/99); , provide that the exception enunciated is not limited to cases where the employee dies, but rather, only a “significant worsening” of the plaintiffs condition must be shown.
  • Harvey v. Brown 105 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Co., 1998-0454 (La.03/12/99), .
  • Sonya Reeder Seaman v. Charles W. Seaman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    See Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99)
  • Seaman v. Seaman 54 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Innovative Hospitality Systems, LLC v. Abe's, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99)
  • Innovative Hospitality Systems, L.L.C. v. Abe's Inc. 52 So. 3d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Dugan v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 41 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), ; McGinnis v. Waste Management of Louisiana LLC, 40,330 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), .
  • Thomas v. Hollywood Casino 13 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Jackson v. M.R. Pittman, LLC 5 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Poche v. HUEY P. LONG MEDICAL CENTER 983 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    See Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Sandra Poche v. Huey P. Long Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    See Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99)
  • Hayes v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. 945 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), , where an exception of no cause of action was held proper in an employee's tort action against his employer asserting that the employer's abrupt and arbitrary termination of the employee's workers' compensation benefits resulted in the employee's severe depression, a nonlife-threatening condition.
  • Leboeuf v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 934 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), , the defendants specifically aver that controlling jurisprudence bars a tort action against an employer where an employee alleges a delay in medical treatment for a non-life-threatening injury.
  • McGinnis v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF LOUISIANA 914 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Allen v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 830 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    See Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Rhodes v. Lewis 817 So. 2d 64 La. 2002
    See Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Dupree v. Dixie Carbonic, Inc. 817 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    The trial court dismissed the employee's claim, concluding that the Louisiana Supreme Court decision of Kelly v. *485 CNA Insurance Company, 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), was controlling.
  • Babineaux v. Kemper Insurance 787 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    As this court stated in Batiste 00-323 at p. 6; 774 So.2d at 1039 , the supreme court, in Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-454 (La.3/12/99); , did not consider “ ‘whether an employee can ever, under any circumstances, state a cause of action in tort against his or her employer whose intentional and arbitrary denial of medical benefits causes the employee’s disabling condition to undergo foreseeable disastrous worsening to a level something less than death.
  • Coleman v. Deno 787 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), ; Schnell v. McKenzie's Tree Service, Inc., 98-1269 (La.App.
  • Finova Capital Corp. v. IT Corp. 774 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Livaccari v. Alden Engineering, Inc. 808 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    ARGUMENT Defendants, relators herein, contend the trial court erred in not maintaining the peremptory exception raising the objection of no cause of action because the instant petition does not fit within the narrow exception to the exclusivity provision of Louisiana's workers' compensation law recognized in Weber and Kelly v. CNA Insurance, Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Batiste v. Webre 774 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In Kelly v. CNA Insurance Co., 98-454 (La.3/12/99); , the supreme court considered whether the exception created in Weber extends to a non-death case and determined that workers' compensation was the plaintiffs exclusive remedy because her medical condition, carpal tunnel syndrome, was "not life threatening."
  • Hodges v. BOSSIER MED. CENTER HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION 764 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    On July 1, 1999, BMC filed an exception of no cause of action, asserting that under Kelly v. CNA Insurance Company, 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), , it was immune from tort actions and the plaintiff's sole remedy was in workers' compensation.
  • Carver, Inc. v. Dixon 759 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Hale v. FA Richard & Associates, Inc. 756 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    In Kelly v. CNA Insurance Company, 98-0454 (La.03/12/99), , the supreme court reversed this court's decision on the facts presented, finding that the employer's arbitrary denial or delay of medical treatment for the employee's carpal tunnel syndrome would not result in death or a significant worsening of her condition.
  • Chase v. LA. RIVERBOAT GAMING PTNRSHP. 747 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    This case is before us on remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court, which directed this court to reconsider our prior writ denial in light of the recent case of Kelly v. CNA Insurance Company, 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .
  • Chase v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership 740 So. 2d 1290 La. 1999
    Co., 98-0454 (La.3/12/99), .