Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. Fetzer, 719 So. 2d 466.
-
Leanne Bridges v. James Bridges
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/15/98), the father sought an increase in visitation after the parties entered into a stipulated joint custody plan which included a provision that the plan was to be treated as a considered decree.
-
Willard Johnson v. Leroy Celestine Crescent Crown Distributing, LLC and Zurich American Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/15/98), “it is well settled that the transfer of an action to a correct venue, after prescription has run, does not resurrect the plaintiff’s lawsuit.” See also Allen v. State, Dep’t of Pub.
-
A'jaysia Joseph v. Crescent Crown Distributing, LLC Zurich American Insurance Company and Leroy Celestine
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/15/98), “it is well settled that the transfer of an action to a correct venue, after prescription has run, does not resurrect the plaintiff’s lawsuit.” See also Allen v. State, Dep’t of Pub.
-
Shauna Michelle Beebe v. Shaun Aaron Delcambre
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/15/98), as follows: [V]isitation is not strictly a “species of custody” and, instead, has an independent basis in the Civil Code.
-
Beebe v. Delcambre
194 So. 3d 1214
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 3/6/98), , writ denied, 98-931 (La.5/15/98), , as follows: < [Visitation is not strictly a “species of custody” and, instead, has an independent basis in the Civil Code.
- Mehe Hafaiedh Lambert v. Charles Willis Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- Larry Allen v. State of La, Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
Allen v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections
107 So. 3d 106
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/6/98) , , writ denied, 98-933 (La.5/15/98), .
- Deanna Arrington v. Joshua H. Arrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Jade McCann Barnes v. Paul Dewayne Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Susan Elizabeth Jackson Piccione v. Richard James Piccione
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/15/98), this court stated: the supreme court stated that in a case involving modification of a considered decree of permanent custody, the burden of proof for the petitioning party is to show that the continuation of the present custody is so
-
Piccione v. Piccione
20 So. 3d 576
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 3 Cir. 3/6/98), , writ denied, 98-931 (La.5/15/98), , this court stated: the supreme court stated that in a case involving modification of a considered decree of permanent custody, the burden of proof for the petitioning party is to show that the continuation of the present custody is so deleterious to the child so as
-
Valerie B. Bandy v. Patrick T. Bandy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5/15/98), a panel of this court discussed Article 136, revision comment (b), and the burden of proof of the party seeking to modify visitation as follows: the supreme court stated that in a case involving modification of a
-
Bandy v. Bandy
971 So. 2d 456
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/6/98) , , writ denied, 98-931 (La.5/15/98), , a panel of this court discussed Article 136, revision comment (b), and the burden of proof of the party seeking to modify visitation as follows: the supreme court stated that in a case involving modification of a considered decree of permanent custody, the burden of
- Linda Snyder Gerace v. Randy Joseph Gerace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Gerace v. Gerace
927 So. 2d 622
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/6/98) , , writ denied, 98-0931 (La.5/15/98), .
- Rebecca Lalonde Desoto v. Troy William Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
DeSoto v. DeSoto
893 So. 2d 175
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 3/6/98) , , writ denied, 98-0931 (La.5/15/98), .
-
R.J. v. M.J.
880 So. 2d 20
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3rd Cir.3/6/98), , writ denied, 98-0931 (La.5/15/98), .
-
Rj v. Mj
880 So. 2d 20
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3rd Cir.3/6/98), , writ denied, 98-0931 (La.5/15/98), .
-
Banton v. Combs
766 So. 2d 767
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
3d Cir.03/06/98), , writ denied, 98-0933 (La.05/15/98), .
-
Jones v. Tezeno
758 So. 2d 896
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 3/6/98) ; , writ denied, 98-0931 (La.5/15/98); ( (La.App.