DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 721 So. 2d 885.

400 citing documents.

  • Hughes v. New Orleans Saints & LWCC 924 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98) .
  • Blanchard v. Rental Service Corp., USA 920 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Brown v. Texas-La Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), ; Barbarin v. TLC Home Health, 02-1054, p. 9 (La.App.
  • Arias v. Certified Coating, Inc. 924 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Wall v. Avoyelles Correctional Center 921 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Brown [v. Texas-LA Cartage, 98-1063, (La.12/1/98), ], 890.
  • Yuronda Jackson v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • David D. Reed v. Willis Abshire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    12/1/98), as follows: In general, one can surmise from the plain meaning of the words making up the phrase “reasonably controvert” that in order to reasonably controvert a claim, the defendant must have some valid reason or evidence upon which to base his denial of benefits.
  • David Wall v. Avoyelles Correctional Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Jackson v. CHRISTUS HEALTH CENTRAL LOUIS. 922 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Reed v. Abshire 921 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the meaning of "reasonably controverting a claim" in Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), , as follows: In general, one can surmise from the plain meaning of the words making up the phrase "reasonably controvert" that in order to reasonably controvert a claim, the defendant must have some valid reason or evidence upon which to base his denial of benefits.
  • Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 17 (La.6/29/01), (“‘[W]here a new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.’”) (quoting Brown v. Texas-LACartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ); Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La.
  • Eddie Angelle v. Taylor Oilfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Angelle v. Taylor Oilfield 918 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    “Arbitrary and capricious behavior consists of willful and unreasoning action, without consideration and regard for facts and circumstances presented, or of seemingly unfounded motivation.” Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, pp. 8-9 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC. 919 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 17 (La.6/29/01), ("`[W]here a new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the *802 legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.'") ( quoting Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ); Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La.
  • Hammock v. Weyerhaeuser 917 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    The court in Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), , explained the "reasonably controverted" standard: ...
  • Burrow v. Delta Container Corp. 923 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [6] Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98) .
  • Clifton Maricle v. Sunbelt Builders, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98)
  • Maricle v. Sunbelt Builders, Inc. 916 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Nelson v. Windmill Nursery of Louisiana 923 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the meaning of reasonably controverting a claim.
  • Bordelon v. Cox Communications 905 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center 902 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Thus, Young is apparently seeking attorney fees and penalties under paragraph F. Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), , explained the difference between the arbitrary and capricious standard and the reasonably controverted standard as follows: Unreasonably controverting a claim...
  • Sabine Police Jury v. Com'r of Alcohol 898 So. 2d 1244 La. 2005
    SWAT 24, XXXX-XXXX p. 17, 808 So.2d at 305 quoting Brown v. Texas-La Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ( citing New Orleans Rosenbush Claims Service, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 94-2223 p. 12 (La.4/10/95), .)
  • Citgo Petroleum v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N 898 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Thomas v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. 894 So. 2d 1091 La. 2005
    This Court has previously stated that "the purpose of an imposition of penalties is to `nudge the employer into making timely payments when there is no reasonable basis for refusing or delaying its obligation.'" Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 p. 13 (La.12/1/98), , citing Weber v. State, 93-0062 p. 8 (La.4/11/94), .
  • Brenda Jeanise v. Tommy Cannon D/B/A Rental World, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    12/1/98), the supreme court stated: "Arbitrary and capricious behavior consists of willful and unreasoning action, without consideration and regard for facts and circumstances presented, or of seemingly unfounded motivation."
  • Jeanise v. Cannon 895 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, pp. 8-9 (La.12/1/98), , the supreme court stated: "Arbitrary and capricious behavior consists of willful and unreasoning action, without consideration and regard for facts and circumstances presented, or of seemingly unfounded motivation."
  • Easly v. D & O Contractors, Inc. 895 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Jackson, supra., citing Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Hallaron v. Jacob's Engineering Group, Inc. 893 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Jackson, supra ., citing Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Tuckerson v. Holiday Retirement Corp. 892 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98) .
  • Thompson v. the Animal Hosp. 889 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Marlena Alexander v. Autozone, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Alexander v. Autozone, Inc. 889 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Don R. Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets 888 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 11 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Allen v. Schneider National Bulk Carriers 885 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), , the Supreme Court fully discussed this issue.
  • Kerry Anderson Doumite v. Kvhp - Fox 29 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    23:1201, a court must ascertain whether the employer or his insurer engaged in a nonfrivolous legal dispute or possessed factual and/or medical information to reasonably counter the factual and medical information presented by the claimant throughout the time he refused to pay all or part of the benefits allegedly owed.” Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98)
  • Doumite v. KVHP-FOX 29 884 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), .
  • State v. Johnson 884 So. 2d 568 La. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 17 (La.6/29/01), ("`[W]here a new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.'") ( quoting Brown v. Texas-LACartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ); Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La.
  • Jones v. Gilbert Southern Corp. 881 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Texas-La Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), ; Barbarin v. TLC Home Health, 02-1054, p. 9 (La.App.
  • Howard v. HOLYFIELD CONST., INC. 878 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Texas-La Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, (La.12/1/98), .
  • Ronald Lanclos v. Coastal Food, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/1/98), that: “The unambiguous language of La.R.S.
  • Lanclos v. Coastal Food, LLC. 877 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    With regard to the issue of penalties in the event of an underpayment of benefits, the Louisiana Supreme Court noted in Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 8 (La.12/1/98), , 890 that: “The unambiguous language of La.R.S.
  • Explained State ex rel. L.R.S. 877 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    “Where a new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.” State in the Interest of DM., 2003-2754 (La.1/30/04), , citing Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Sarrio v. Stalling Const. Co. 876 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    *164 Brown v. Texas-La Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), .
  • Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp. 872 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), , the supreme court stated: To determine whether the claimant's right has been reasonably controverted, thereby precluding the imposition of penalties and attorney fees under La.
  • Marjorie Lane Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), the supreme court stated: To determine whether the claimant’s right has been reasonably controverted, thereby precluding the imposition of penalties and attorney fees under La.
  • Fontenot v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 870 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    1 Cir. 9/26/03), (quoting Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, pp. 8-9 (La.12/1/98), ), states that "[f]or purposes of La.
  • Margaret Fontenot v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    1 Cir. 9/26/03), (quoting Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, pp. 8-9 (La.12/1/98), ), states that “[f]or purposes of La.
  • Paul Thomas, Jr. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/1/98), the supreme court examined the term “reasonably controverted”: 14 The phrase “reasonably controverted,” on the other hand, mandates a different standard.
  • Thomas v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. 871 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Brown v. Texas La Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), , the supreme court examined the term "reasonably controverted": The phrase "reasonably controverted," on the other hand, mandates a different standard.
  • Floyd Boone, Jr. v. Mid-State Marketing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004