DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd., 712 So. 2d 74.

15 citing documents.

  • Silver Dollar Liquor, Inc. v. Red River Parish Police Jury 56 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Assessors’ Retirement and Relief Fund, 05-2548 (La.10/1/07), ; Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134 (La.5/15/98), ; State v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, 188 La.
  • City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUND 986 So. 2d 1 La. 2008
    Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134, p. 9 (La.5/15/98), -81 ; State v. Craig, 93-2515, 93-2654, 93-2589, p. 7 (La.5/23/94), ; State v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, 188 La.
  • Peeler v. Dural 958 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    5th Cir.5/27/98), , [contract for trust fund]; Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd., 98-1122, 98-1133 (La.5/15/98), [casino gaming contract].
  • Barnes v. Riverwood Apartments Partnership 870 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122 (La.5/15/98), citing Thomas v. Highlands Ins.
  • Prator v. Caddo Parish 865 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/15/98), (quoting from Abbott v. Parker, 259 La.
  • Charles S. Reily v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134, pp. 18-19 (La.5/15/98), the supreme court, quoting from Abbott v. Parker, 259 La.
  • Reily v. State 864 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134, pp. 18-19 (La.5/15/98), , the supreme court, quoting from Abbott v. Parker, 259 La.
  • Edmonds v. City of Shreveport 855 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd., 98-1122, 98-1133 (La.5/15/98), ; American Waste & Pollution Control Co. v. St.
  • Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Calif. Union Ins. 859 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    American Waste & Pollution Control Company, 627 So.2d at 162 ; See also Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134 (La.5/15/98), ; Perschall v. State, 96-0322 (La.7/1/97), ; Lifemark Hospitals v. St.
  • Edgar Benjamin Fontaine Testamentary Trust v. Jackson Brewery Marketplace 847 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See also Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134 (La.5/15/98), ; Perschall v. State, 96-0322 (La.7/1/97), ; Lifemark Hospitals v. St.
  • Women's Health Clinic v. State 825 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board, 98-1122, pp. 18-19 (La.5/15/98), , the supreme court quoted the following language from Abbott v. Parker, 259 La.
  • Duplantis v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics 782 So. 2d 582 La. 2001
    See Cat's Meow, 98-0601 at 8, 720 So.2d at 1193 ; Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd., 98-1122, p. 18 (La.5/15/98), ; American *601 Waste & Pollution Control Co. v. St.
  • Bank of West Baton Rouge v. Stewart 808 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1 Cir. 4/22/98) , , writ granted, (affirmed in part; reversed in part on other grounds), 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134 (La.5/15/98), .
  • Bebop's Ice House, Inc. v. City of Sulphur 774 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd., 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134, p. 9 (La.5/15/98); -81 .
  • Demars v. Natchitoches Parish School Board 741 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    It is well settled that repeals by implication are not favored, and such a “repeal by implication will be found only where there is an irreconcilable conflict between two' Lstatutes and where there exists no possible construction that could give both statutes effect.” Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd., 98-1122, 98-1133, 98-1134, p. 9 (La.5/15/98); .