Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State Museum, 739 So. 2d 748.

182 citing documents.

  • SOUTHERN TOOL & SUPPLY v. Beerman Precision, Inc. 862 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, p. 10 (La.3/2/99), .
  • State Civil Service Commission v. Director of the Department of Public Safety 849 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, p. 11 (La.3/2/99) .
  • Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 846 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99); .
  • Civil Service Commission of City of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans 839 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    As the Louisiana Supreme Court has noted, “[a]n exception of no cause of action is likely to be granted only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff includes allegations that show on the face of the petition that there is some insurmountable bar to relief.” City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, p. 10 (La.3/2/99), (Emphasis supplied).
  • Pellegrin v. City of Thibodaux 837 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Hamway v. Braud 838 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, pp. 9-10 *806 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Savoy v. Terrebonne Men's Carnival Club, Inc. 835 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • CAMPAIGN FOR a LIVING WAGE v. New Orleans 825 So. 2d 1098 La. 2002
    of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, p. 11 (La.3/2/99), ).
  • Nitro Gaming Inc. v. Entercept Services Inc. 823 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    The supreme court explained the exception of no cause of action in City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), , 755-756 as follows: The purpose of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
  • Bourgeois v. Dunn 822 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, p. 15 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Dupree v. Dixie Carbonic, Inc. 817 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Powell v. Dorris 814 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    In City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), , the supreme court explained the exception of no cause of action and the appellate review of the decision on such an exception: The purpose of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
  • Silmon Property & Development Co. v. Pleasantview Apartments Partnership 814 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Alomang v. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. 811 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State Museum, 98-1170, p. 9 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Hawkins v. Evangeline Bank & Trust Co. 817 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Connolly v. Stone 807 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    .City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Farmer v. Marriott International, Inc. 806 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Rogers v. Ash Grove Cement Co. 799 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    DISCUSSION In City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the exception of no cause of action and the appellate review of the decision on such an exception: The purpose of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
  • ECLIPSE TELECOM. v. Telnet Intern. Corp. 800 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the law on the peremptory exception of no cause of action in City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), as follows: The purpose of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
  • Horrell v. Horrell 808 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99); ; Ridgedell, .
  • State Ex Rel. Ieyoub v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. 790 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99); .
  • Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp. 785 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, p. 11 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Spears v. American Legion Hosp. 780 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Woods v. St. Charles Parish School Bd. 783 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, at 9 (La.3/2/99), (citations omitted).
  • Darby v. Wal-Mart, Inc. 775 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), ; Holloway v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 33,026 (La.App.2d Cir.5/15/00), .
  • Blackett v. City of Monroe 766 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-C-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Crosby v. Stinson 766 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    NO CAUSE OF ACTION In City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), , the supreme court explained the exception of no cause of action and the appellate review of the decision on such an exception: The purpose of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
  • Worthen v. DeLong 763 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of the Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170, p. 11 (La.3/2/99); .
  • SOUTHERN GEN. AGENCY v. Safeway Ins. Co. 769 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    New Orleans v. Board of Directors of the Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99); ; Jones *608 v. Tezeno, 99-1693 (La.App.
  • Holloway v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-C-1170 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Guidry v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce 755 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State Museum, 98-1170, p. 9 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Dabdoub v. Ochsner Clinic 802 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum, 98-1170 (La.3/2/99), .