Cited by

9/3/99), addressed imposition of sanctions by a court, including appellate standard of review, stating: The United States Supreme Court has recognized that, upon their creation, courts are universally acknowledged to be vested with the power to impose silence, respect, decorum, and submission t

9/3/99), the Louisiana Supreme Court, on rehearing, remanded a matter to the district court for a contradictory hearing to determine what, if any, sanctions were appropriate for a group of defendants and their attorneys who failed to disclose a $10,000,000 excess policy during discovery.

Peterson v. Gibralter S & L, Inc., 9821-1601 (La.9/3/99), .

4 Cir. 11/12/97) , ), on reh’g in part, 98-1601, 98-1609 (La.9/3/99), .

Mrs. Munar next claims that the trial judge erred in failing to grant a JNOV as *1279 to the jury's determination on liability, The criteria applicable to our review of the denial of Mrs. Munar's motion for JNOV was set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, pp. 5-6 (La.5/18/99), , rehearing in part, (La.9/3/99), : JNOV is warranted only when the, facts and inferences, viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,

9/3/99), : JNOV is warranted only when the facts and inferences, viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, is so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of the moving party that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict; the motion should be granted only

And Loan, Inc., 98-1601, 98-1609 (La.9/3/99), .