DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gedward v. Sonnier, 728 So. 2d 1265.

15 citing documents.

  • Markeeta Tennie v. Farm Bureau Property Insurance Company d/b/a Louisiana Farm Bureau Insurance Company and Kristopher Carter La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
  • In Re Richmond 996 So. 2d 282 La. 2008
    Gedward v. Sonnier, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/2/99), , citing Taylor v. State Farm Mut.
  • PARKVIEW BAPTIST CHURCH AND SCHOOL v. White 971 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Smith v. Rocks 957 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Simmons v. Weiymann 943 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Becker v. Dean 854 So. 2d 864 La. 2003
    Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Wickramasekra v. ASSOC. INTERN. INS. CO. 890 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    For an explanation of the rules of interpretation that Louisiana courts use to interpret insurance contracts, see generally Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99), ; Valentine v. Bonneville Insurance Co., 96-1382 (La.3/17/97), ; Ledbetter v. Concord General Corp., 95-0809 (La.1/6/96), , modified on other grounds, 95-0809 (La.4/18/96)
  • St. Pierre v. Permanent General Assur. 829 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    See Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99); .
  • Henderson v. Sellers 815 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    In the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Gedward [v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99); ] the Court found that the child resided with the father, whom the child was visiting at the time of the accident, even though the mother was the domiciliary parent.
  • Alpaugh v. Continental Ins. Co. 791 So. 2d 71 La. 2001
    We granted writs in this case to further discuss the residency issue presented as it may be contrary to our recent cases on this subject, specifically the cases of Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99), and Carbon v. Allstate Insurance Co., 97-3085 (La.10/20/98), .
  • Alpaugh ex rel. Alpaugh v. Continental Insurance Co. 776 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    (La.App.3 Cir. 4/3/96); , writ granted in pari, denied in pari, 96-1030 (La.1996); ; Chapman v. Poirrier, 96-977 (La.App.3 Cir. 2/5/97); , writ denied, 97-1164 (La.1997); ; Gedward v. Sonnier, 97-1068 (La.App.3 Cir. 5/20/98); , writ granted, 98-1688 (La.1998); , aff'd in pari and rev’d in pari, 98-1688 (La.1999), .
  • Paxton v. Sanderson 761 So. 2d 503 La. 2000
    The court of appeal, relying on this court’s decision in Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.3/2/99), , found the policy ambiguous in this regard and reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insurer.
  • Meyerex rel. Meyer v. Gulotta 747 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688, p. 8 (La.3/2/99), .
  • Paxton v. Sanderson 763 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Since the instant appeal was lodged, the Third Circuit’s decision in Gedward was affirmed in part and reversed in part (on other grounds) by the Louisiana Supreme Court, Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688 (La.03/02/99), .
  • Carrier v. Reliance Insurance 742 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    The interpretation of insurance policies was recently addressed in Gedward v. Sonnier, 98-1688, p. 6 (La.3/2/99); , where the court stated: Each provision in an insurance policy must be interpreted in light of the other provisions so that each is given the meaning suggested by the contract as a whole.