DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1188.

24 citing documents.

  • Richard Fountain v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and/or Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    4/13/99), and Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 00-078 (La.
  • Lewis v. Jazz Casino Co., L.L.C. 245 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    4/13/99), , 1190-91 (emphasis added) (citing White , 97-0393, pp. 4-5, 699 So.2d at 1190 -91 ).
  • Crawford v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 180 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    While there is no bright line time period, a plaintiff must show that the condition existed for “such a period of time.” Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1998-1939 (La.04/13/99), ; Jones v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 37,117 (La.App.2d Cir.05/14/03), .
  • Ferlicca v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 175 So. 3d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    While there is no bright line time period, a plaintiff must show that the condition existed for “such a period of time.” Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), ; Jones v. Brookshire Grocery, Co., 37,117 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03), .
  • Davis v. Cheema, Inc. 171 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See, e.g., Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 00-0078, p. 5 (La.6/30/00), (“[S]uch speculation falls far short of the factual support required to establish that plaintiff will be able to satisfy his evidentiary burden of proof at trial.”); Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans Casino 158 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.04/13/99), -91 (citing White, 97-0393 at pp. 4-5, 699 So.2d at 1084-85 ) (footnote omitted).
  • Glass v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. 50 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    While there is no bright line time period, a plaintiff must show that the condition existed for “such a period of time.” Oster v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 04-117 at 6-7; 881 So.2d at 1261 , citing Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939, p. 3 (La.4/13/99); .
  • Bell v. American General Inv. LLC 911 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX *412 (La.4/13/99), , the supreme court explained that the legislature has set forth a clear and unambiguous definition of the term, "constructive notice."
  • Billye S. Cohen, Et Vir v. Brookshire Brothers, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4/13/99), (quoting White, 699 So.2d at 1084); See also La.R.S.
  • Cohen v. Brookshire Brothers, Inc. 887 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939, p. 3 (La.4/13/99), ( quoting White, 699 So.2d at 1084 ); See also La.R.S.
  • Oster v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 881 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [7] Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Dotson v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 872 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Kennedy[ v. Wal-Mart Stores, 98-C-1939 (La.1999), ] supra.
  • Jones v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 847 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Bassett v. Toys" R" US Delaware, Inc. 836 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    *469 Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.04/13/99), -91 , citing White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-0393 (La.09/09/97), -85 .
  • Moore v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 824 So. 2d 345 La. 2002
    See Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, 98-1939 *346 (La.4/13/99), ; Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, 00-0078 (La.6/30/00), ; White v. Wal-Mart Stores, 97-0393 (La.9/9/97), .
  • Campo v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 821 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the slip-and-fall plaintiffs burden of proof, as follows: In a slip and fall case, the plaintiffs burden of proof is set forth in La.
  • Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc. 816 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-0393 (La.9/9/97), , Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Terry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 780 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See also, Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99); , Henry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 99-1630 (La.App.
  • Robinson v. BROOKSHIRES 26 769 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    See also Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.04/13/99), ; White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-0393 (La.09/09/97), .
  • Henry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 758 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    See Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99); and White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-393 (La.9/9/97); .
  • Hall v. K-Mart 755 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Oliva v. WINN DIXIE LOUISIANA, INC. 756 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    In Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), , the supreme court reaffirmed White 's strict construction of the statutory mandate that plaintiff prove constructive notice under La.
  • Zagar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 747 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    App. 3 Cir. 6/17/98); , subsequently reversed on the facts at 98-1939 (La.4/13/99); , because it involved a 1994 pre-amendment accident.
  • Crawford v. RYAN'S FAM. STEAK HOUSES, INC. 741 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-1939 (La.4/13/99), .