Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Toys" R" US, Inc., 754 So. 2d 209.

24 citing documents.

Demetria Joseph v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
11/30/99), Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.
B. Guttry v. Costco Wholesale Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
11/30/99), that the heightened burden under La.R.S.
Victoria Thi Ngo Versus Walmart Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
11/30/99), ); see also Hodges v. J.C.
Richard Fountain v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and/or Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Sheila M. Guidry v. Brookshire Grocery Store La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Lewis v. Jazz Casino Co., L.L.C. 245 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Explained Bertha Gruver v. the Kroger Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Explained Gruver v. Kroger Co. 54 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Smith v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., et al., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99), .
Kenneth Wayne Jackson v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Jackson v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 11 So. 3d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
[Smith v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., et al., 98-2085__|3(La.11/30/99), .]
Hodges v. J.C. Penney Corp. 900 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Smith v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., et al, 98-2085 (La.11/30/99), .
Green v. K-Mart Corp. 849 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
In its brief, K-Mart urges that the "falling merchandise" standard set forth by the supreme court in Smith v. Toys `R' Us, Inc., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99); , and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00); , are inapplicable to this case because the shelf fell, which caused the merchandise to fall.
Green v. K-Mart Corp. 834 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
In its brief, K-Mart urges that the "falling merchandise" standard set forth by the supreme court in Smith v. Toys `R' Us, Inc., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99); , and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00); , are inapplicable to this case because the shelf fell, which caused the merchandise to fall.
Updegraff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Smith v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., 98-2085, pp. 7-8 (La.11/30/99), .
Updegraff v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Smith v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., 98-2085, pp. 7-8 (La.11/30/99), .
Satterwhite v. Reilly 817 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Smith v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99) ; -65 (La.1989).
Branch v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 806 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2 Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the law for falling merchandise cases in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), , extensively citing its pronouneement in Smith v. Toys ‘R’ Us, 98-2085 (La.11/30/99), : In a “falling merchandise” case under R.S.
Daspit v. Barber 786 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Smith v. Toys "R" Us, 98-2085 (La.11/30/99), .
Stepherson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 785 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Smith v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99), ; Belgard v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 00-0058 (La.App.
Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 775 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Smith v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., 98-2085, pp. 7-8 (La.11/30/99); .
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 84 La. 2000
This court has held in Smith v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., et al., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99), , that the heightened burden under R.S.
Belgard v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 771 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Smith v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., 98-2085, at p. 4 (La.11/30/99), .
Dupas v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Co. 762 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Smith v. Toys ‘R’ Us. Inc., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99); .
Mannina v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 757 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Smith v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., 98-2085, at p. 4 (La.11/30/99), .