Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 737 So. 2d 41.
-
Troy D. Magee (Deceased)/wallace Magee and Ciara Caston Filey v. City of New Orleans Fire Department
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
6/29/99), (citations omitted).
- Mark Shubert v. City of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
- Roderick O. Newman v. Concordia Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Lwcc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
-
Mona Leblanc v. Walmart Distribution Center
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
6/29/99), awards of penalties and attorney fees in workers’ compensation cases are essentially penal in nature.
- Brandon Broussard v. Structural Preservation Systems,llc New Hampshire Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Donald Jenson v. Berry Global Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- Stephen K. Lentz v. City of New Orleans, Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
-
Michael Boudreaux v. Take 5, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
6/29/99), (citation omitted).
- Patricia Matthews v. Big Easy Janitorial, L.L.C., and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self Insurers Fund La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
-
Timothy Batiste v. Minerals Technology, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Robert Landry v. Lofton Security Service, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 1998–2271 (La.6/29/99)
-
Michael Thibodeaux v. St. Mary Parish School Board
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98- 2271, pp. 4- 5 ( La.6/ 29/ 99)
- Eleazar Rivera Salgado Versus Tri-Parish Roofing & Home Improvements La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- Ralph Stretzinger Versus Claims Management, Inc. and Wal-Mart La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- Mary Ortega v. Cantu Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Daniels v. State Through Department of Transportation and Development 275 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- Bailey v. Rent A Center 274 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Marvin Ray Scott v. Packaging Corporation of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Scott v. Packaging Corp. of Am. 251 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Jewel Vaughn, III v. Dis-Tran Steel, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
6/29/99), awards of penalties and attorney fees in workers’ compensation cases are essentially penal in nature.
-
Chelsea Jackson v. Aramark Healthcare Services
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
23:1201 F, is strictly construed Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), and penalties are not allowed if the employer has “some valid reason or evidence upon which to base his denial of benefits,” Brown v. Texas-La.
-
Vaughn v. Dis-Tran Steel, LLC
239 So. 3d 893
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/29/99), , 46, awards of penalties and attorney fees in workers' compensation cases are essentially penal in nature.
-
Jackson v. Aramark Healthcare Servs.
239 So. 3d 878
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/29/99), , and penalties are not allowed if the employer has "some valid reason or evidence upon which to base his denial of benefits," Brown v. Texas-La.
- Neece v. Louisiana Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Assoc. 206 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
Wilson v. Glazer's Distributors of Louisiana, Inc.
185 So. 3d 891
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
-
Maxwell v. Care Solutions, Inc.
179 So. 3d 650
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Authement, supra; Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.06/29/99), .
-
Bridges v. Gaten's Adventures Unlimited, L.L.C.
167 So. 3d 992
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Detraz v. Lee, 05-1263 (La.1/17/07), ; Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , 43 n. 3; Chauvin v. Terminix Pest Control, Inc., 11-1006 (La.App.
- Belinda Flores v. a & Z Tobacco, LLC, D/B/A Pak a Sak La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
Flores v. A & Z Tobacco, LLC
152 So. 3d 1004
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
- Travis Davis v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
Davis v. Boise Cascade Co.
149 So. 3d 331
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/6/12) , (citing Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ).
-
Futch v. Horseshoe Casino
146 So. 3d 818
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
23:1201 F, is strictly construed, Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , and penalties are not allowed if the employer has “some valid reason or evidence upon which to base his denial of benefits,” Brown v. Texas-La.
-
Jimmerson v. Johnson Storage & Moving Co.
142 So. 3d 111
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
-
Betty Sinegal v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Sinegal v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office
139 So. 3d 630
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Aisola v. Beacon Hospital Management, Inc.
140 So. 3d 71
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 4 Cir. 12/3/03), (citing Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), ).
-
Robert Burke v. Venture Transport Logistics, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Burke v. Venture Transport Logistics, LLC
131 So. 3d 530
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
John Carriere v. Patients Care Medical Supply
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Carriere v. Patient's Care Medical Supply
127 So. 3d 115
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Henderson v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
128 So. 3d 599
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Silver-man, supra; Crochet v. Barbera Chevy-Chrysler Co., Inc., 04-1390 (La.App.lst Cir.6/29/05), .
-
John Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash
126 So. 3d 848
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Mulvihill v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2
116 So. 3d 672
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , the Court stated, "[t]he 1983 revisions also amended La.
-
Martha Diana Rougeau v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Rougeou v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital
107 So. 3d 851
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonr'y, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citation omitted).
-
Brenda Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99)
-
Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital
100 So. 3d 404
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
-
Janneck v. LWCC
102 So. 3d 239
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
-
Keys v. Republic Services
99 So. 3d 734
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citation omitted).