Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 737 So. 2d 720.

65 citing documents.

Debra Winesberry v. St. Bernard Parish Government La. 2025
Bobby Washinton v. Robinson Bros Farms, LP La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Heidi Rieth and Jason Bush v. Maria Munguia La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
6/29/99), the Supreme Court held that “[a] continuing tort is occasioned by [continual] unlawful acts, not the continuation of the ill effects of an original, wrongful act.” The Court stated “[t]he continuous conduct contemplated in a continuing tort must be tortious and must be the operating cause of the injury.” Id.
Kitty Dunn v. Regional Transit Authority La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Explained State Of Louisiana, Ex R El. Justin Dale Tureau Vs. La. 2022
The distinction between continuous and discontinuous operating causes was clarified by this court in Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326 (La.6/29/99), a property damage case, in the context of discussing continuing torts in general.
Atlantic Pacific Equipment, Inc. v. Gulf South Services, Inc. f/k/a/ Gulf South Scaffolding, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Irma Rabun, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
6/29/99), from a continuation of the ill effects of the original, wrongful act, which does not create a continuing tort, Id.
Lafayette Consolidated Government v. Rmd Holdings, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Christopher A. Bailey (D) v. Dr. Michael Loewe La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In re Med. Review Panel of Gerard Lindquist 274 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Shane R. Pierce and Kimberly M. Pierce v. Irma M. Rodriguez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
wherein the court found that the act of digging a canal was the single cause of the injury for prescriptive purposes even though there were continuing ill effects from the tortious act.
Pierce v. Rodriguez 268 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See Crump v. Sabine River Authority , wherein the court found that the act of digging a canal was the single cause of the injury for prescriptive purposes even though there were continuing ill effects from the tortious act.
Succession of Hazel R. Savoie and Richard Michael Savoie v. John H. Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“A continuing tort is occasioned by unlawful acts, not the continuation of the ill effects of an original, wrongful act.” Crump v. Sabine River Auth., 98-2326, p. 9 (La.6/29/99)
Succession Savoie v. Carmouche 269 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Barkerding v. Whittaker 263 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Duet v. Landry 250 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/29/99), , 729,] the issue was whether the [d]efendant's reassurances about the plaintiffs['] concerns were sufficient to constitute an acknowledgement that would suspend prescription.
Harris v. Breaud 243 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Benson v. State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Office of Alcohol & Tobacco Control 227 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Bihm v. Deca Systems, Inc. 226 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/29/99), (that held that Louisiana law allows for the continuing tort theory to apply in cases where there has been an ongoing violation of the law); Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Cons., Inc., 98-2216 (La.
Wilkerson v. Dunham 218 So. 3d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Alexander v. La. State Board of Private Investigator Examiners 211 So. 3d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Meiko Prevo v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections Division of Probation and … La. 2015
Prevo v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections Division of Probation & Parole 187 So. 3d 395 La. 2015
Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 13 (La.6/29/99), .
No Drama, LLC v. Caluda 177 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Crump v. Sabine River Auth., 98-2326 (La.6/29/99), .
Gloria M. Ned v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Ned v. Union Pacific Corp. 176 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“A continuing tort is occasioned by unlawful acts, not the continuation of the ill effects of an original, wrongful act.” Crump v. Sabine River Auth., 98-2326, p. 9 (La.6/29/99), .
Walton v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 162 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
The court reasoned that a “continuing tort is occasioned by unlawful acts, not the continuation of the ill effects of an original, wrongful act.” Marin at 253 , citing Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326 (La.6/29/99), .
Glenn Bernard v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
6/29/99), discussed the theory of continuing tort: As previously noted by this Court, the theory of continuing tort has its roots in property damage cases and requires that the operating cause of the injury be a continuous one which results in continuous damages.
Bernard v. City of Marksville 154 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, pp. 9-10 (La.6/29/99), , discussed the theory of continuing tort: As previously noted by this Court, the theory of continuing tort has its roots in property damage cases and requires that the operating cause of the injury be a continuous one which results in continuous damages.
Scott v. Zaheri 157 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 7 (La.6/29/99); , the Supreme Court noted that “the theory of continuing tort has its roots in property damage cases and requires that the operating cause of the injury be a continuous one which results in continuous damages.” The Supreme Court has held that “[a] continuing tort is occasioned by continual unlawful acts and for t
In re Medical Review Proceedings of DeBram 102 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“A continuing tort is occasioned by unlawful acts, Innot the continuation of the ill effects of an original, wrongful act.” Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 09-2868, p. 26 (La.10/19/10), ; Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 9 (La.6/29/99), .
Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
In Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 7 (La.6/29/99), , this court noted "the theory of continuing tort has its roots in property damage cases and requires that the operating cause of the injury be a continuous one which results in continuous damages."
Lee v. City of Shreveport 58 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
In Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 1998-2326 (La.06/29/99), , the Court made it clear that “[a] continuing tort is occasioned by unlawful acts, not the continuation of the ill effects of an original, wrongful act.” The action SSP claims caused it damages was the enactment of the ordinance.
Roba, Inc. v. Courtney 47 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
As to the claim that the delictual claim is an ongoing claim or continuous tort, the court in Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 1998-2826 (La.6/29/99) , held that a “continuous tort” required that the operating cause of the injury be continuous, or repetitive.
Explained Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc. 45 So. 3d 991 La. 2010
The distinction between continuous and discontinuous operating causes was clarified by this court in Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326 (La.6/29/99), , a property damage case, in the context of discussing continuing torts in general.
Kelley v. Dyson 40 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Crump v. Sabine River Auth., 98-2326 (La.6/29/99), .
Lopez v. House of Faith Non-Denomination Ministries 29 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Crump v. Sabine River Authority, p. 7 (La.1999), , the Supreme Court of Louisiana examined the theory of continuing tort as follows: As previously noted by this Court, the theory of continuing tort has its roots in property damage cases and requires that the operating cause of the injury be a continuous one which results in continuous damages.
Miller v. Conagra, Inc. 991 So. 2d 445 La. 2008
Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 1998-2326, p. 7 (La.6/29/99), .
Gary L. Miller v. Conagra, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/29/99), see also, Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia, 01-151 (La.App.
Miller v. ConAgra, Inc. 970 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 10 (La.6/29/99), ; see also, Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia, 01-151 (La.App.
LEJEUNE BROS. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 981 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Lejeune Brothers, Inc. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co., LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
“A continuing tort is occasioned by [the continual] unlawful acts, not the continuation of the ill effects of an original, wrongful act.” (1999).
Thomas v. STATE EMPLOYEES GROUP BENEFITS 934 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 7 (La.6/29/99), .
Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 13 (La.6/29/99), .
Travis Cooper v. Louisiana Deptartment of Public Works La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Cooper v. La. Dept. of Public Works 870 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
[10] Crump v. Sabine River Auth., 98-2326 (La.6/29/99), ; (La.
Carter v. Haygood 865 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Limitations of Actions § 177 (1987).” Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326 at p. 10 (La.06/29/99), .
Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 849 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
The supreme court granted writs and remanded the case to this court to reconsider defendants' exceptions of prescription in light of its decision in Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326 (La.6/29/99); .
Cavaness v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 846 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Crump v. Sabine River Authority, 98-2326, p. 12 (La.6/29/99); , the supreme court recognized that an acknowledgment can be express or tacit.