Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 734 So. 2d 623.
- Gerald Greene v. Highlands Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
Greene v. Highlands Insurance Co.
159 So. 3d 496
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
- Demetria Mouton v. Lafayette Physical Rehabilitation Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
Mouton v. Lafayette Physical Rehabilitation Hospital
114 So. 3d 626
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., INC. v. Hilton
966 So. 2d 545
La. 2007
Hosp., 95-0017, p. 9 (La.9/22/05); , overruled on other grounds by Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); , reh'g denied, 6/25/99; Touchard, 617 So.2d at 888 ).
-
Hayes v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
970 So. 2d 547
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
Caldwell Wholesale Co. v. Smith
916 So. 2d 1255
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center
902 So. 2d 1180
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
Maschek v. Cartemps USA
896 So. 2d 1189
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hospital, 95-0017, p. 6 n. 5 (La.9/22/95), , overruled on other grounds by Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564, p. 5 (La.5/18/99), ; Williams v. BET Construction, Inc., 2000-1765 (La.App.
-
Chad Sasser v. Tyler Timber
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5/18/99), -27, the supreme court discussed the history and application of both the federal and state offset provisions as they apply to an employer’s request for an offset as follows: 3 The present federal statute, under the 1965 re-enactment as part of th
-
Sasser v. Tyler Timber, Inc.
889 So. 2d 1161
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564, pp. 6-8 (La.5/18/99), -27 , the supreme court discussed the history and application of both the federal and state offset provisions as they apply to an employer’s request for an offset as follows: 14The present federal statute, under the 1965 re-enactment as part of the major revision of the Social Security Act, requires that the amoun
-
Ausberry v. Ouachita Fertilizer Co.
882 So. 2d 666
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
See Al Johnson Construction Company and Liga v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.05/18/99), .
-
Rodriguez v. City of New Orleans
883 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
The Supreme Court in Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564, pp. 4-5 (La.5/18/99), , recognized that La.R.S.
-
Jones v. General Motors Corp.
871 So. 2d 1109
La. 2004
This court held in Garrett , 95-0017 at 13, 660 So.2d at 848 (overruled on other grounds in Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564, p. 10, (La.5/18/99), ), the employee's aggregate remuneration could not go below 66 2/3 percent of the average weekly wage.
-
Jones v. General Motors Corp.
847 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
See also, Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.05/18/99), .
-
Critser v. Dillard's Department Stores, Inc.
836 So. 2d 366
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), , the supreme court expressly overruled Garrett on the issue of an employer’s entitlement to credit for Social Security Disability benefits, concluding that Social Security Disability benefits are not included in “Benefits under disability plans,” as described in La.
-
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Keel
817 So. 2d 1
La. 2002
Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
Williams v. BET Const., Inc.
818 So. 2d 21
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hospital, 95-0017, p. 6 (La.9/22/95), ; overruled on other grounds by Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), ; Gilmore v. SGB Construction Services, Inc., 97-1669, p. 3 (La.App.
-
Deville v. Technical Resource
799 So. 2d 800
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In 1999, the supreme court specifically overruled Garrett in Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
K-Mart v. Turner
799 So. 2d 594
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
| sHowever, we will not apply such a standard because this case has been overruled by Al Johnson Construction v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); .
-
Anderson v. Orleans Parish School Bd.
792 So. 2d 943
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
[3] We note that Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hospital, 95-0017 (La.9/22/95), , was subsequently overruled by Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
Comeaux v. City of Crowley
793 So. 2d 1215
La. 2001
What precipitated the instant action was this court's decision in Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), , which overruled Garrett, supra .
-
Zeringue v. Karl Ott Poles & Pilings
808 So. 2d 628
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Defendant further argued that Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), should not be applied retroactively, as defendant had acquired a vested property right to the offset awarded in the December 31, 1997 judgment.
-
Lee v. M & O, Inc.
782 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); .
-
Critser v. Dillard's Dept. Stores, Inc.
791 So. 2d 702
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
[4] Citing Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), , claimant's petition notes that the employer's right to an offset under La.
-
Alleman v. Ke-Co, Inc.
783 So. 2d 409
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Fifteen days later, on May 18, 1999, the Louisiana Supreme Court rendered Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Donald Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); , overruling its prior decision in Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hospital, 95-0017 (La.9/22/95); , which interpreted La.R.S.
-
Town of Basile v. Clark
769 So. 2d 591
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Claimant refers to the holding in Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); , in which the supreme court reversed Garrett and held that La.R.S.
-
Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council
762 So. 2d 608
La. 2000
Al Johnson Const. Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
City of Covington v. Walker
762 So. 2d 703
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
That case is Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
Duckworth-Woods Tire Service v. Lettellier
762 So. 2d 1119
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), )
-
Overruled
Sonnier v. Town of Vinton
759 So. 2d 818
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
The Garrett opinion was overruled by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); , to disallow the offset of social security benefits under La.R.S.
-
Daigle v. Employers National Insurance Co.
747 So. 2d 696
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Considering the recent Louisiana Supreme Court case Al Johnson Construction Company and LIGA v. Donald Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); , there is no question that La.R.S.
-
McCoy v. Cracker Barrel Stores, Inc.
745 So. 2d 702
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
The supreme court has granted writs and remanded this matter for reconsideration in light of its recent decision in Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); .
-
Leson Chevrolet, Inc. v. Triche
742 So. 2d 1047
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
We note that Garrett has recently been overruled by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Al Johnson Construction Company v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), , which holds that an employer is not entitled to an offset for social security disability benefits under La.Rev.Stat.
-
Duckworth-Woods Tire Service v. Lettellier
747 So. 2d 525
La. 1999
Remanded to the Court of Appeal to reconsider in light of Al Johnson Construction Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564, .
-
Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council
739 So. 2d 297
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99), .
-
National Union Fire Insurance v. Walker
742 So. 2d 585
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In light of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision in Al Johnson Construction Company, et al. v. Pitre, 98-2564 (La.5/18/99); overruling its prior decision in Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hosp., 95-0017 (La.9/22/95); , we reverse the judgment rendered by the Workers’ Compensation Judge and remand this case solely for hearing and ruling on the employer’s re *586 verse offset claim under La.R.S.