Jamison v. Hilton
Jamison v. Hilton, 730 So. 2d 871 (La. 1999).
Cited by
Followed in 1 Explained in 1
- Wrm v. Hcv 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- W.R.M. v. H.C v. and M.J.V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- W.R.M. v. H.C.V. 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Deano v. Akkaraju 856 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Susan Deano, John L. Deno & Mark Guilbeau v. Vidyadhar Akkaraju, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Taylor v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 800 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Naquin v. Titan Indem. Co. 767 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Moreau v. State 752 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- Chinn v. Mitchell 734 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Opinion text
730 So.2d 871 (1999) Earl B. JAMISON v. William Earl HILTON, etc. No. 98-C-2916. Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 5, 1999. Denied. KNOLL, J., concurs with reasons. CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ. KNOLL, Justice, Concurring. [*] Denied. The result is correct. La.R.S. 13:5107(D), as amended and reenacted by 1997 La.Acts 518, § 1, provides in Section 5 that "[t]he provisions of this Act shall be applicable only to suits filed on and after its effective date." Act 518 became effective January 1, 1998, and in my view this is interpretive legislation, and therefore the amended statute was not applicable to this action, which was filed on June 4, 1993. NOTES [*] Johnson, J., not on panel. See Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.