Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stogner v. Stogner, 739 So. 2d 762.

141 citing documents.

  • Collins v. Collins 104 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 2/2/94), , abrogated on other grounds by Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Ogden v. Gray 99 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Id.; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General Ex Rel. State of Louisiana v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Id.; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Caldwell ex rel. State v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. 100 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Id.; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Norcold, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La7/7/99)
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Norcold, Inc. 88 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), , citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99)
  • Dejoie v. Guidry 71 So. 3d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Credit v. Richland Parish School Board 61 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Boyter, 99-0761 at 9, 756 So.2d at 1129 ; [Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044] at p. 5 [ (La.7/7/99), ] at 766.
  • City of DeQuincy v. Henry 62 So. 3d 43 La. 2011
    Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Gebhard v. Gebhard 60 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    [sic], in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that any change in circumstances is sufficient to justify a reduction or increase in child support, a (La.App.
  • Robertson v. Robertson 37 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    See Stogner v. Stogner, 1998-3044 (La.07/07/99), .
  • Harang v. Ponder 36 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (Citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), ).
  • Smith v. Smith 31 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Natalie Jeanne Edmonds Lord v. Brett Kenneth Lord La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Lord v. Lord 22 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 10/7/98) , ; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Smith v. Smith 16 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Authement v. Authement, supra, was abrogated on other grounds in Stogner v. Stogner, 1998-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • GUARISCO CO., INC. v. State 6 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Reed 5 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.07/07/99), .
  • Ealem v. Prevost Memorial Hospital 5 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Stogner v. Stogner, 1998-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Brossett v. Brossett 996 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Wade Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Clara Brossett v. Keithern D. Brossett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Id.; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Rene Windham Harper v. Randolph Wallace Harper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Harper v. Harper 977 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. White 954 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.07/07/99), ; Harper v. Harper, 33,452 (La.App.
  • Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick 948 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Bagwell, supra, citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), ; (La.
  • Colvin v. LOUISIANA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND 947 So. 2d 15 La. 2007
    Id.; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Gardner v. Gardner 946 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), ; Reeves, supra .
  • Hernandez v. Hernandez 938 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Shaunn Caillier McCorvey v. Derriel Carlton McCorvey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that any change in circumstances is sufficient to justify a reduction or increase in child support, a (La.App.
  • McCorvey v. McCorvey 926 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that any change in circumstances is sufficient to justify a reduction or increase in child support, a (La.App.
  • Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans 925 So. 2d 1202 La. 2006
    Id.; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Moss v. State 925 So. 2d 1185 La. 2006
    Id.; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Bridges v. Autozone Properties, Inc. 900 So. 2d 784 La. 2005
    Stogner v. Stogner, XXXX-XXXX (La.07/07/99) .
  • Watson v. Watson 894 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    DISCUSSION John's sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his request for modification on the basis that he failed to show a material change in circumstances in light of the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Stogner v. Stogner, XXXX-XXXX (La.07/07/99), .
  • Ferrell Lavergne v. Quality Fabricators of Eunice, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), [,] [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • In Re JAB 884 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 9 (La.1999), , the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically declined to abrogate "that body of law which has recognized that a consent (stipulated) judgment is by its nature a bilateral agreement between the parties wherein the parties adjust their differences by mutual consent and thereby put an end to a lawsuit with each party
  • Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Richard v. Hall 874 So. 2d 131 La. 2004
    Boyter, 99-0761 at 10, 756 So.2d at 1129 ; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99), .
  • January v. January 876 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Stogner v. Stogner, 98-C-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Lorendia Kay January v. Gregory Troy January, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Michael Gregory Thevenot, Sr. v. Christine Dronet Thevenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    7/7/99), where the supreme court held that, when parties stipulate in open court regarding their child support obligation, the adequacy of the of amount of child support established by the stipulation must be reviewed and approved by the trial court in light of the child support guidelines.
  • Thevenot v. Thevenot 864 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    IfiOur consideration of this matter includes the case of Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), , where the supreme court held that, when parties stipulate in open court regarding their child support obligation, the adequacy of the of amount of child support established by the stipulation must be reviewed and approved by the trial court in light of the child support guidelines.
  • Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co. 860 So. 2d 1112 La. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), , citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La7/7/99)
  • Shultz v. Shultz 867 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1 Cir. 7/9/03) , , this court considered the deference owed to stipulated judgments in light of the Louisiana supreme court's decision in Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • Sidney Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners 858 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Anthony Crane Rental, LP v. Fruge 859 So. 2d 631 La. 2003
    Boyter, 99-0761 at p. 9, 756 So.2d at 1130 (citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 2 (La.7/7/99), ).