DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. America's Favorite Chicken Co., 729 So. 2d 1060.

28 citing documents.

  • RJ Messinger, Inc. v. Rosenblum 894 So. 2d 1113 La. 2005
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , ; Nalty v. D.H.
  • Roundtree v. New Orleans Aviation Bd. 896 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir.2/3/99), ; Montgomery v. Gosserand , 98-1966 (La.App.
  • Thomas v. State ex rel. Department of Corrections 879 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 2/3/99), , this Court examined the prior decisions of this circuit concerning La.Code Civ.
  • RJ Messinger, Inc. v. Rosenblum 876 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , ; Nalty v. D.H.
  • Altvater v. LaBranche Properties Inc. 871 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , and Miller v. Tassin, 02-2383 (La.App.
  • LHO New Orleans LM, L.P. v. MHI Leasco New Orleans, Inc. 869 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • JCM Const. Co., Inc. v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 860 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp. 867 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Clark v. Legion Ins. Co. 853 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , Mercury points to language from our subsequent opinion in Evans v. Charity Hospital in New Orleans, 00-0202 (La.App.
  • Miller v. Tassin 849 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , in which we stated: We expressly disapprove and overrule the procedure of converting the appeal from a non-final judgment to a supervisory writ and then considering the merits, as was done in Karim v. Finch Shipping Co., Ltd., 97-2518 (La.App.
  • Audubon Institute, Inc. v. Chambers 830 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , we held that “[a] trial court’s mere signing of an order for appeal from a partial judgment will not make that judgment immediately appealable.” In addition, we held that the certification by the court “to consider the partial judgment as final must be of record when the appeal is first filed.” We went on to note, h
  • Pinkins v. University Hospital 828 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , we held that “[a] trial court’s mere signing of an order for appeal from a partial judgment will not make that judgment immediately appeal-able.” In addition, we held that the certification by the court “to consider the partial judgment as final must be of record *43 when the appeal is first filed.” We went on to no
  • Dean v. United Medical Center 816 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , ; Montgomery v. Gosserand, 98-1966 (La.App.
  • Evans v. CHARITY HOSP. IN NEW ORLEANS 801 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , in which it was held that this Court no longer would convert appeals from partial summary judgments that had not been certified as final by the district court to applications for supervisory writs.
  • Woodward v. Cutrer 796 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) ; ; In re Chemical Release at Bogalusa, 98-1122 (La.App.
  • Lightell v. Phillip 797 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , ; Montgomery v. Gosserand, 98-1966 (La.App.
  • Grant v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 785 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/03/99) , , decided prior to the 1999 amendments to La.C.C.P.
  • Nalty v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 775 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , this Court held that valid certification of a partial judgment as final also requires that the trial court give explicit reasons on the record as to why there is no just reason for delay, and that mere conclusory statements do not suffice.
  • Alford v. Johnson Rice & Co., LLC 773 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Roberts v. Orpheum Corp. 753 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Chittenden v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 748 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • City of New Orleans v. Howenstine 737 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • Firstar Communications of Louisiana, L.L.P. v. Tele-Publishing, Inc. 732 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Narcise v. Jo Ellen Smith Hosp. 729 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) ; , this court examined all the prior decisions of this circuit concerning Article 1915 certification and issued a set of general rules to be applied to future appeals of partial judgments which lack the proper certification or agreement of the parties.
  • Hunter v. Tensas Nursing Home 738 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , the court recognized the need for consistency in that circuit’s rulings on partial judgments, and, en banc, adopted a procedure for dealing with flawed partial judgment dispositions.
  • In Re Succession of Grimmett 738 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/3/99) , , the court recognized the need for consistency in that circuit's rulings on partial judgments, and, en banc, adopted a procedure for dealing with flawed partial judgment dispositions.
  • Deal v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 735 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • Lake Marina Tower Condominium Ass'n v. Ceramics Systems, Inc. 730 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999