Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaney v. Coastal Cargo, Inc., 730 So. 2d 971.

18 citing documents.

Insulation Technologies, Inc. v. Industrial Labor and Equipment Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 1/20/99), ).
Don A. Rouzan v. Ivy Saizan Rouzan La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 1/20/99), ).
Ikonitski v. Ikonitski 204 So. 3d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. $1330.00 in U.S. Currency (Reference: Robert Mincey) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Jackson v. FedEx Corporated Services, Inc. 165 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Washington v. Landry's Seafood House New Orleans, Inc. 154 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 1/20/99), ; Strickland v. Bd.
Roman v. LRASIF Claims Management 81 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir.1/20/99), , 973 In the analogous case of Davis v. Dunn & Bush Const., 01-2472, p. 4 (La.App.
Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 78 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/20/99), , “[i]t is a basic principle of our legal system that a final judgment cannot be rendered against a party who has not been provided with proper notice.” (Emphasis ours.)
Fisher v. MAJESTIC TRUCKING, INC. 35 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 1/20/99), , It is a basic principle of our legal system that a final judgment cannot be rendered against a party who has not been provided with proper notice.
City of Baton Rouge v. Am. Home Assur. Co. 991 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Theodore Magnon, Sr. v. Charlene Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Magnon v. Miller 939 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Jackson v. General Motors Truck Plant 830 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Lassere v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HOSP., OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH 808 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4th Cir.1/20/99), , (La.App.
Johnson v. Canale 769 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 1/20/99) , ; Strickland v. Board of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University and Agr.
Richardson Ex Rel. Brown v. Lagniappe Hosp. Corp. 801 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Macaluso v. Macaluso 762 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4th Cir.1/20/99), , 973 concluded that it was error for the trial court to dismiss the plaintiffs suit on summary judgment when the plaintiff had not been given proper notice of the date set for hearing.
MacAluso v. MacAluso 762 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4th Cir.1/20/99), , 973 concluded that it was error for the trial court to dismiss the plaintiff's suit on summary judgment when the plaintiff had not been given proper notice of the date set for hearing.