Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 737 So. 2d 14.

54 citing documents.

  • Steve Crooks v. State of La. Through the Dept. of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    d liability in contract or for injury to person or property.” This court has recognized Section 10(A) as an “unequivocal, self-executing waiver of sovereign immunity as to suit and liability in contract and tort cases.” Fulmer v. State, Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries,10-2779 (La.7/1/11), (quoting Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98–2510 (La.5/18/99), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98–2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), (citing Sudwischer, 97–0[7]85, p. 9, 705 So.2d at 728).
  • State v. Farry 270 So. 3d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    5/18/99), , 20 (citing Sudwischer , 97-0[7]85, p. 9, 705 So.2d at 728 ).
  • State v. Stewart 176 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), .
  • State v. Gordon 146 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Washington , 2002-2196, p. 3, 830 So.2d at 290 , quoting Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), .
  • State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Jerry Ramos v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    5/18/99), ), writ denied, 08-1074 (La.
  • Ogden v. Gray 99 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), , citing Sudwischer v. Estate of Hojfpauir, 97-0785, p. 8 (La.12/12/97), , the Court stated: Substantive laws are laws that impose new duties, obligations or responsibilities upon parties, or laws that establish new rules, rights and duties or change existing ones.
  • Succession of DiLeo 90 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Because an appellate court is bound to apply the law as it exists at the time of its decision, see Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, (La.5/18/1999), (even where the law has changed during pen-dency of suit, if retroactive application is permissible, new law applies on appeal), Paragraph C is determinative in the matter before us. .
  • Orleans Parish School Board v. Lexington Insurance Co. 76 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., 2007-2371, p. 1918 (La.7/1/08), ; Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Smith v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Shires 71 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 68 So. 3d 499 La. 2011
    ion provides, in Article XII Section 10, “Neither the state, a state agency, nor a political subdivision shall be immune from suit and liability in contract or for injury to person or property.” This Court has recognized this section as an “unequivocal, self-executing waiver of sovereign immunity as to suit and liability in contract and tort cases.” Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Prejean v. Guillory 38 So. 3d 274 La. 2010
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 6 (La.5/18/99), ; Underwood v. Lane Memorial Hosp., 97-1997, p. 4 (La.7/8/98), ; La.Rev.
  • Harrah's Bossier City Investment Co., LLC v. Bridges 41 So. 3d 438 La. 2010
    2 Cir. 9/21/94), , overruled on other grounds, Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), : “After our examination of the record, we find that the plaintiffs properly raised this [constitutional] issue in the trial court, but a ruling on the issue was pretermitted.
  • HARRAH'S BOSSIER CITY INV. CO. v. Bridges 41 So. 3d 438 La. 2010
    2 Cir. 9/21/94), , overruled on other grounds, Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), : "After our examination of the record, we find that the plaintiffs properly raised this [constitutional] issue in the trial court, but a ruling on the issue was pretermitted.
  • Noel v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 36 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Jeanne M. Olson v. Rapides Parish Sheriff & Tax Assessor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    5/18/99), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that “[i]nterpretative laws are those which clarify the meaning of a statute and are deemed to relate back to the time that the law was originally enacted.”)2 We examine the record to determine whether the record demonstrates that the plaintiff could prove that th
  • Olson v. Rapides Parish Sheriff & Tax Assessor 7 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 20 (La.5/18/99), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that “[ijnterpretative laws are those which clarify the meaning of a statute and are deemed to relate back to the time that the law was originally enacted.”) 2 We examine the record to determine whether the record demonstrates that the plaintiff could prove that the t
  • Forbes v. Cockerham 985 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Jerry Ramos v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Ramos v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 977 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • In Re Minor Child Seddon 942 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 1998-2510, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Beutler England Clinic (Marie Kershaw) v. Mermentau Rice, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    5/18/99), King v. Phelps Dunbar, L.L.P., 98-1805 (La.
  • BEUTLER ENG. CHIRO. CLIN. v. Mermentau Rice 931 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Id.; Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), ; King v. Phelps Dunbar, L.L.P., 98-1805 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Christopher Sims v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    5/18/99), the supreme court held that the notice requirements of Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:2800 cannot be applied retroactively to causes of action which arose before the effective date of November 23, 1995, shared with the constitutional amendment to Article XII, § 10(C), which allowed the legislature to limit the liab
  • Sims v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 897 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    However, in Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , the supreme court held that the notice requirements of Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:2800 cannot be applied retroactively to causes of action which arose before the effective date of November 23, 1995, shared with the constitutional amendment to Article XII, § 10(C), which allowed the legislature to limit the liabili
  • Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. 872 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 1998-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Spaht v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 851 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 1998-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Woodbury v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 848 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    See, Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 844 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , the supreme court concluded that before the November 23, 1995 amendment to the constitution, the statute was unconstitutional.
  • Ferrouillet v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 836 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See, Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Street v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 829 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Sudwischer v. Estate of Hoffpauir, 97-0785 (La.12/12/97), ; Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • State v. Washington 830 So. 2d 288 La. 2002
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), (citing Sudwischer , 97-0285, p. 9, 705 So.2d at 728 ).
  • State v. Washington 830 So. 2d 288 La. 2002
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 8 (La.5/18/99), (citing Sudwischer , 97-0285, p. 9, 705 So.2d at 728 ).
  • Rosen v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    9:2800 was at issue in Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , wherein the Supreme Court held that La.
  • Cox v. Moore 805 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99); .
  • Hicks v. State 802 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that LSA-R.S.
  • Evans v. CHARITY HOSP. IN NEW ORLEANS 801 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    art. 6; Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Adams v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 804 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    We take judicial notice, however, that in Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.
  • Harvey v. STATE, DOTD 799 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Fontenot v. Noble 786 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Laws which are procedural or interpretive may apply retroactively to a cause of action which arose prior to the law’s effective date; however, laws which are substantive in nature may only apply prospectively, “in the absence of contrary legislative expression.” Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 7 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Bozeman v. State 787 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    [1] Under Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , La.
  • Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
    We take judicial notice, however, that in Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , this Court held that LA.REV.STAT.
  • Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, p. 6-7 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Odom v. City of Lake Charles 790 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99); .
  • Mayfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 770 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), .
  • Scott v. Pyles 770 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510, pp. 1-2 n. 2 (La.5/18/99), , 17 n. 2; Brown v. Louisiana Indem.
  • Dupree v. City of New Orleans 765 So. 2d 1002 La. 2000
    We take judicial notice, however, that in Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), this Court held that La.
  • Irion v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 760 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    [2] However, pursuant to the Louisiana Supreme Court's recent decision in Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99), , this argument fails.
  • Prudhomme v. City of Iowa 758 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La.5/18/99); , the supreme court declared La.