DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 731 So. 2d 881.

51 citing documents.

  • Michael Munson v. Henifff Transportation Systems, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
  • O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. v. Terry White D/B/A The Shop La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • Daniel E. Becnel, III Versus Charles Weinreis, as Owner, Eugene Weinreis, as President, and Cheyenne Ridge Outfitters and … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    4/13/99), citing Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475, 105 S.Ct.
  • Phillips C. Witter v. Sanibel Yacht & Slip, LLC; Page Global Marine, LLC; Page Marine Holdings, LLC; and … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • J&J Livestock, LLC v. Musa Slaughterhouse, LLC 268 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • Crosstex Energy Servs., LP v. Tex. Brine Co. 253 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Kaye v. Karp 237 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
    4/13/99), , 885, citing *621 Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz , 471 U.S. 462 , 475, 105 S.Ct.
  • Ohle v. Uhalt 213 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/13/99), (noting the exception was "supported by an affidavit”); (La.
  • Delahoussaye v. Boelter 199 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Albitar v. Albitar 197 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Huey Leger, Et Ux. v. Icl America Limited La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 1998-1126 (La.4/13/99), cert.
  • Leger v. ICL America Ltd. 175 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 1998-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Devillier v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 161 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    95 (1945); Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.04/13/99), , cert.
  • Richard C. Bentley v. Lcm Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Bentley v. LCM Corp. 140 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Lewis v. Pine Belt Multipurpose Community Action Acquisition Agency, Inc. 138 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Coming Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Bioclin, BV v. Multigyn USA, LLC 129 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    ness of jurisdiction arises’ and the burden then shifts to the opposing party to prove the assertion of jurisdiction would be so unreasonable in *638 light of traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice as to overcome the presumption of reasonableness created by the defendant’s minimum contacts with the forum.’ ” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), (citing de Reyes v. Marine Mgmt.
  • Park West Children's Fund, Inc. v. Trinity Broadcasting Network,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 1998-1126 (La.4/13/99), cert.
  • Park West Children's Fund, Inc. v. Trinity Broadcasting Network, Inc. 156 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Maguire Plastic Surgery Center, LLC v. Booker 117 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning 5Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Broussard v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. 65 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See e.g. Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • LOBELL v. Rosenberg 62 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    ss of jurisdiction arises’ and ‘the burden then shifts to the opposing party to prove the assertion of jurisdiction would be so unreasonable in light of traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice as to overcome the presumption of reason *827 ableness created by the defendant’s minimum contacts with the forum.’ ” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), , citing de Reyes, supra, 586 So.2d at 107 (La.1991).
  • Swoboda v. Hero Decks 36 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    leness of jurisdiction arises’ and ‘the burden then shifts to the opposing party to prove the assertion of jurisdiction would be so unreasonable in light of traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice as to overcome the presumption of reasonableness created by the defendant’s minimum |4contacts with the forum.’ ” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), (citing de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., ).
  • LaRocca's Auto Sales Floorplan, Inc. v. Shelton 27 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Southeast Wireless Network, Inc., 06-1736 at 5, 954 So.2d at 125 , citing Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Tsaoussidis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 28 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Puckett v. ADVANCE SPORTS, INC. 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4/13/99), , cert, denied, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct.
  • Bridges v. Mosaic Global Holdings, Inc. 23 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    The “minimum contacts” prong is satisfied by a single act or actions by which the defendant “purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities |T ¿within the forum state, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Ruppert v. George Kellett & Sons, Inc. 996 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    at 5, 954 So.2d at 125 , 954 So.2d at 125 , citing Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Crummey v. Morgan 965 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), -86 , cert.
  • Southeast Wireless v. US Telemetry 954 So. 2d 120 La. 2007
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • STERIFX, INC. v. Roden 939 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Quality Design and Const. v. Tuff Coat Mfg. 939 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    559, 567 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 6 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Hayward Williams v. Frank Parra Auto Plex, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Williams v. Frank Parra Auto Plex, Inc. 929 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, pp. 6-7 (La.4/13/99), -86 , cert.
  • Engineering Dynamics, Inc. v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 917 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Edi v. Mit 917 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Dahmes v. Champagne Elevators, Inc. 869 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    [2] At the hearing, counsel for Perfection argued that Perfection merely manufactured a component shipped to a Wisconsin elevator company and that was insufficient under Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert denied, Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Ruckstuhl, 528 U.S. 1019 , 120 S.Ct.
  • Alonso v. Line 846 So. 2d 745 La. 2003
    We discussed the history of Louisiana's long-arm Statute, whereby this state's courts can constitutionally exercise personal jurisdiction over non-residents, in Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Eusea v. Blanchard 836 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), ; Spomer v. Aggressor Int'l, Inc., 00-1646 (La.App.
  • Spomer v. Aggressor Intern., Inc. 807 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Dedeaux v. Dymond 792 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • A & L ENERGY, INC. v. Pegasus Group 791 So. 2d 1266 La. 2001
    13:3201(B), the Louisiana longarm statute and constitutional due process are coextensive, such that "`the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.'" Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), (quoting Petroleum Helicopters, ).
  • Tulane Indus. Laundry, Inc. v. Quality Lube & Oil, Inc. 779 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • AO Smith Corp. v. AMERICAN ALTERN. INS. 778 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court analyzed La.
  • Davis v. Dempster, Inc. 790 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    We also address the plaintiff's contention that this matter is controlled by the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99); .
  • Curran v. Fisherman Marine Products, Inc. 773 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Thus, under current Louisiana law, “the sole inquiry into jurisdiction over a nonresident is a one-step analysis of the constitutional due process requirements.” Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • A & L ENERGY, INC. v. Pegasus Group 771 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Burger King, supra ; Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Bordelon v. Dehnert 770 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 98-1126, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Fleming v. Standard Furniture Manufacturing 769 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The jurisprudence in this area of the law was reviewed most recently in Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 98-1126, pp. 5-6 (La.4/13/99), -86 , cert.
  • Hagan v. Stone 742 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    95 (1945); Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corporation, 98-1126 (La.04/13/99), .