DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Marcus v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc., 740 So. 2d 603.

67 citing documents.

  • Cole-Gill v. Moore 862 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co., Inc., 98-2040 (La.06/04/99), ; Pareti v. Sentry Indem.
  • Alpaugh ex rel. Alpaugh v. Continental Insurance Co. 863 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., Inc., 98-2040, p. 3 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Clarendon Nat. Ins. v. Jeansonne & Remondet 859 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co., Inc., 98-2040 (La.06/04/99), ; Pareti v. Sentry Indem.
  • Distinguished Freeman v. Philan 859 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    The trial court answered the latter question in the affirmative by finding the Louisiana Supreme Court's public policy reasoning in Marcus v. Hanover Insurance Co., Inc., 1998-2040 (La.6/4/99), , applicable to the business use exclusion in Allstate's policy thus rendering it unenforceable.
  • Walker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. 850 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Marcus v. Hanover Insurance Company, 1998-2040 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Wakefield v. Reliance Nat. Indemn. Co. 845 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Co., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Hamilton v. Anco Insulation, Inc. 844 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Marcus v. Hanover Insurance Company, Inc., 98-2040, p. 4 (La.6/4/99), , (La.
  • Kinchen v. Lewis 844 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Marcus v. Hanover Insurance Co., 98-2040, p. 2 (La.6/4/99), , the victims of an automobile accident brought an action against the insured and the automobile liability insurer to recover for injuries sustained in the accident while the insured was driving his personal car in the course and|Kscope of his employment.
  • Collins v. Randall 836 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., Inc., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), -610 (holding that where an exclusion is held unenforceable because it contravenes public policy, the exclusion will be unenforceable only up to the statutory minimum limits and the exclusion will be enforced as to that portion of the policy in excess of the minimum limits).
  • Clements v. FOLSE EX REL. CLEMENTS 830 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., Inc., 98-2040, p. 4 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Savana v. CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS 825 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., Inc., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Dunn v. Terry 821 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    In Marcus v. Hanover Insurance Co., Inc., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), , the supreme court explained: An insurance policy is a contract that constitutes the law between the parties....
  • State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Delatte 806 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Co., Inc., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Dunn v. Builodeau 802 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Co., 98-2040, p. 4 (La.6/4/99), .
  • Samia Companies v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 789 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Co., Inc., 98-2040, at 4 (La.6/4/99), , citing Pareti v. Sentry Indem.
  • Williams v. US Agencies Cas. Ins. Co., Inc. 779 So. 2d 729 La. 2001
    Co., Inc., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), : The Louisiana Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Law, found in La.
  • Ligeikis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 745 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Co., 98-2040 (La.6/4/99), , rehearing denied; La.