Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State, in Interest of Sm, 719 So. 2d 445.

134 citing documents.

  • State Ex Rel. LB v. GBB 831 So. 2d 918 La. 2002
    3231 , 73 L.Ed.2d 928 (1982); see also, State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. L.S. 814 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922, p. 14 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State Ex Rel. JB v. JB, JR. 811 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. D.A.G. 812 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98); .
  • State ex rel. J.B. v. J.B. 811 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State in Interest of Jw 801 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. L"F"B 796 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3231 , 73 L.Ed.2d 928 (1982); see also State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. L.C.K. v. M.E.K. 799 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State in Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), ; State in Interest of TD v. Webb, 28,471 (La.App.2d Cir.05/08/96), .
  • State Ex Rel. Gjl 791 So. 2d 80 La. 2001
    and K.K., 774 So.2d at 113 (quoting State in the Interest of J.A., 752 So.2d at 811 ); State in the Interest of S.M., 98 0922, p. 15 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. SNW v. Mitchell 788 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ granted, 98-0922 (La.5/15/98), , reversed on other grounds, 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State Ex Rel. RC v. Everett 787 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), , on remand, 99-0526 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. S.R. 788 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. A.C. 785 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    As the court stated in State in the Interest of S.M., et al., 98-0922, p. 10 (La.10/20/98), , 450: ...
  • State ex rel. T.L.B. 783 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State in Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98); ; on remand, 99-0526 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. D.M. 779 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State In the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. C.P. 777 So. 2d 470 La. 2001
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98)
  • State ex rel. D.R.B. 777 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State in Interest of S.M., et al., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98); , on remand, 99-0526 (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Drb 777 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State in Interest of S.M., et al., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98); , on remand, 99-0526 (La.App.
  • In the Interest of H.H. v. T.H.L. 776 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In State in the Interest of S. M., 98-922, p. 10 (La.10/20/98); (quoting State in the Interest of E. G., 95-18, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. S.M.W. 771 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    | ^Best Interest of the Children The Supreme Court of Louisiana has observed: ‘While the interest of a parent is protected in a termination proceeding by enforcing the procedural rules enacted to insure that parental rights are not thoughtlessly severed, those interests must ultimately yield to the paramount interest of the children.” State in the Interest of S.M., 98-922, p. 15 (La.10/20/98); .
  • State ex rel. E.N. 774 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98); .
  • State ex rel. C.P., K.P.P. & K.M.P. 768 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In State in Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), , appeal after remand sub nom.
  • State Ex Rel. Ms 768 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    3231 , 73 L.Ed.2d 928 (1982); see also State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. M.S. 768 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3231 , 73 L.Ed.2d 928 (1982); see also State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. A.N.B. 750 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State in the Interest of S.M., et al, 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), ; State, in the Interest of D.T., supra
  • State ex rel. J.A. 752 So. 2d 806 La. 2000
    3231 , 73 L.Ed.2d 928 (1982); see also State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State Ex Rel. Ja 752 So. 2d 806 La. 2000
    3231 , 73 L.Ed.2d 928 (1982); see also State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. T.M.H. 748 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State in Interest of S.M., 98-922 (La.10/20/98), ; State in Interest of D.T.
  • State Ex Rel. RC v. Clarke 743 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Ch. C. art. 675; State in the Interest of S.M., et al, 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rell. D.T. 744 So. 2d 1281 La. 1999
    As we recognized in State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 at pp. 14-15 (La.10/20/98), , 452: More than simply protecting parental rights, our judicial system is required to protect the children’s rights to thrive and survive.
  • In the Interest of H.B. 747 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    such as altering or modifying in a significant way the behavior which served as a basis for the State’s removal of a child from the home.’ ” State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922, p.10 (La.10/20/98); , quoting State in the Interest of E.G., 95-0018 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. S.M. 733 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), .
  • State ex rel. T.L.R. v. R.W.T. 737 So. 2d 688 La. 1999
    E.g., State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), (adoption); (custody).
  • State Ex Rel. TLR v. RWT 737 So. 2d 688 La. 1999
    E.g., State in the Interest of S.M., 98-0922 (La.10/20/98), (adoption); (custody).