DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thomas, 719 So. 2d 49.

140 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 173 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Thomas, 91-1144 (La.10/9/98), (per curiam).
  • State v. Bernard 171 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 1 (La.10/9/98), ; State v. Dempsey, 2002-1867, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State v. Reese 166 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Thomas, 1998-1144 (La.10/09/98), ; State v. Johnson, 42,328 (La.App.2d Cir.08/15/07), .
  • State v. Bias 167 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), (per curiam).
  • State v. Wilson 167 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), (per curiam).
  • State v. Shabazz 167 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), (per curiam).
  • State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of thirty-five to fifty years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, ( and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Dontrale Demarko Phillips La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/9/98), the supreme court found a sentencing range of thirty-five to fifty years is acceptable for a first felony offender convicted of armed robbery.
  • State v. Stockman 147 So. 3d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    art. 883; (LaJ1977),10 a trial judge retains discretion to impose consecutive penalties on the basis of other factors, including the offender’s past criminality, violence in the charged crimes, or the risk he or she poses to the general safety of the community.” State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ; -33 (La.1979) (on reh’g).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy L. Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    -33 (La.1979) (on reh‟g).” State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 1 (La.10/9/98)
  • State of Louisiana v. John Wesley Billiot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/9/98), the supreme court stated that a sentencing range of thirty-five to fifty years is acceptable for first felony offenders convicted of armed robbery.
  • State v. Billiot 135 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), , the supreme court stated that a sentencing range of thirty-five to fifty years is acceptable for first felony offenders convicted of armed robbery.
  • State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), (per curiam).
  • State v. Williams 129 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 4/2/03), , citing State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 1 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 4/2/03), , citing State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 1 (La.10/9/98), ; La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 1 (La.10/9/98), , further expounded on the factors the trial court should consider: “Although Louisiana law favors concurrent sentences for crimes committed as part of a single transaction, La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Burton 116 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ; and the cases cited therein.” Likewise, in State v. Wix, 02-1493 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Goudeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), and the cases cited therein.” Id.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest Joseph Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Thomas, 98–1144 (La.10/9/98)
  • State of Louisiana v. Demetrius D. Nash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Nash 112 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Although concurrent sentencing is favored where the offenses arise out of the same course of conduct, the trial court has the discretion to impose consecutive sentences “based on factors including the defendant’s criminal record, the severity or violent nature of the crimes, or the danger the defendant poses to the public.” Runyon, 944 So.2d at 831 (citing State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy L. Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Bartie 104 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    -33 (La.1979) (on reh’g).” State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 1 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Philip A. Geraci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ” See also State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01)
  • State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    10/9/98), and the cases cited therein.” Id.
  • State v. Thompson 100 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ; and the cases cited therein.” Id.
  • State of Louisiana v. Catrina L. Wallace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Wallace 92 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 1 (La.10/9/98), ; State v. Dempsey, 2002-1867, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael David Gordon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    10/9/98), and cases cited therein.” Id.
  • State v. Gordon 85 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ; and cases cited therein.” Id.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gregory Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Cornejo-Garcia 90 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Thomas, 91-1144 (La.10/9/98), (per curiam) (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Garry Wayne McClinton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ” See also State v. Walker, 00- 3200 (La.10/12/01)
  • State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    More recently, in State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed three consecutive sentences totaling between thirty-five and fifty years, stating: Even granting the consecutive nature of the penalties imposed on all three counts, the defendant’s total sentence remains within the 35 to 50 year range this Court has found acceptable for firs
  • State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ” See also State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01)
  • State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), .” See also State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Leland S. Singletary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. CASSIMERE 34 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ; and the cases cited therein.” The defendant’s excessive sentence claim has no merit.
  • State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    10/9/98), (per curiam) (quoting State v. Humphrey, 445 So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cory Reginald Shepherd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ” See also State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01)
  • State v. Shepherd 11 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), .” See also State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), .
  • State v. Lee 15 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98)
  • State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    10/9/98), ” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Perry 9 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), .” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Allen Jermaine Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “In State v. Smith,, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), .” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (La.App.