Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ballard, 747 So. 2d 1077.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Daniel Ralph Haire La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
10/19/99), eliminated the blanket rule that law enforcement officers are incompetent jurors in criminal cases, stating: 7 Law enforcement officers are sworn to uphold the laws of the state, which laws include the provision of a fair trial to each and every defendant.
State of Louisiana v. Antonio Merquis Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/19/99), -80,7 the Louisiana supreme court stated: Law enforcement officers are sworn to uphold the laws of the state, which laws include the provision of a fair trial to each and every defendant.
State v. Harris 274 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/19/99), , 1079-80, 7 the Louisiana supreme court stated: *190 Law enforcement officers are sworn to uphold the laws of the state, which laws include the provision of a fair trial to each and every defendant.
Overruled State v. Lacaze 208 So. 3d 856 La. 2016
State v. Murphy 206 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Dotson 187 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), .
State v. Aguillard 158 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), .
State v. Boyd 104 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99)
State v. Hernandez 82 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jones, 03-3542, p. 11 (La.10/19/04), (citing State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), ).
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
See State v. Ballard, 1998-2198 (La.10/19/99), .
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
In State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), , this Court unanimously overruled State v. Simmons, [2] holding that if a law enforcement officer indicated during voir dire that he could be an impartial juror, the trial court has the discretion to determine whether challenge for cause is warranted.
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
In State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), , and held that if a law enforcement officer indicates during voir dire that he could be an impartial juror, the trial court has the discretion to determine whether or not a cause challenge is warranted.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
Ultimately, in State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), , we unanimously overruled Simmons , holding that if a law enforcement officer indicates during voir dire that he can be an impartial juror, the trial court has the discretion to determine whether or not a cause challenge is warranted.
State v. Jones 884 So. 2d 582 La. 2004
In State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), , this Court held that a person is not automatically disqualified to serve as a juror simply because of his status as a police officer.
State v. Jones 862 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99)
State v. Nguyen 827 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
See State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99); (holding that status as active-duty police officer did not automatically show bias for purposes of selection as juror).
State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
[28] See State v. Ballard, 98-2198, pp. 3-4 (La.10/19/99), -1080 (overturning prior rule which had held active duty peace officers incompetent to serve as jurors).
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
In State v. Ballard, 98-2198 (La.10/19/99), , and held that Louisiana courts should no longer presume that police officers actively engaged in law enforcement are incompetent criminal jurors.
State v. LaCaze 759 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
However, in the recent case of State v. Ballard, 98-2198, p. 5 (La.10/19/99); , the Louisiana Supreme Court overruled Simmons and its progeny "insofar as they hold that a law enforcement officer is not a competent criminal juror."