DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Colomb, 747 So. 2d 1074.

139 citing documents.

  • State v. Major 898 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 3-4 (La.10/1/99), -76 .
  • State of Louisiana v. Carlton G. Monceaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    " State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ().
  • State v. Monceaux 885 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    m. A close proximity in time and location is required between the charged offense and the other crimes evidence "to insure that `the purpose served by admission of other crimes evidence is not to depict defendant as a bad man, but rather to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.'" State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ()....
  • State v. Nguyen 888 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    (quoting State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ).
  • State v. Brown 871 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    m. A close proximity in time and location is required between the charged offense and the other crimes evidence "to insure that `the purpose served by admission of other crimes evidence is not to depict defendant as a bad man, but rather to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.'" State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ().
  • State v. Rhea 868 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    ate might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct, but whether doing so would deprive the State's case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, "`with power not only to support conclusions but to sustain the willingness of jurors to draw the inferences, whatever they may be, necessary to reach an honest verdict.'" State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 4 (La.10/1/99), , quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 186 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 863 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    isiana incorporates a rule of narrative completeness without which the state’s case would lose its “narrative momentum and cohesiveness, ‘with power not only to support conclusions but to ^sustain the willingness of jurors to draw the inferences, whatever they may be, necessary to reach an honest verdict.’ ” 2001-1638, p. 10-11; 838 So.2d at 741 -42 (quoting State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), , quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. George 855 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/01/99), ; State v. Lincoln, supra .
  • State v. Phillips 853 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 3-4 (La.10/1/99), -76 , the supreme court explained: This Court has long approved of the introduction of other crimes evidence, both under the provisions of former R.S.
  • State v. Shaw 850 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Joseph 854 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 3-4 (La.10/1/99), -76 , the supreme court explained: This Court has long approved of the introduction of other crimes evidence, both under the provisions of former R.S.
  • State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99)
  • State v. Dabney 842 So. 2d 326 La. 2003
    See State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), ; (even if a convicted felon's possession of a firearm is justified as a matter of self defense, he must divest himself of the weapon at the earliest practical opportunity); State v. Tatum, 27,301, p. 4 (La.
  • State v. Hall 843 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Gaddis 839 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Millien 845 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    art. 404 B. See State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 4-5 (La.10/1/99), (per curiam).
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
    m. A close proximity in time and location is required between the charged offense and the other crimes evidence "to insure that `the purpose served by admission of other crimes evidence is not to depict defendant as a bad man, but rather to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.'" State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ().
  • State v. Champagne 819 So. 2d 294 La. 2002
    40:967(D); State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/01/99), .
  • State v. Powell 804 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    state might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct but whether doing so would deprive its case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, ‘with power not only to support conclusions but to sustain the willingness of jurors to draw the inferences, *808 whatever they may be, necessary to reach an honest verdict.’ ” State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 4, (La.10/1/99), (citing Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 186 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. Charles 790 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [4] State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Noten 791 So. 2d 607 La. 2001
    e thus possesses the requisite close connexity we have required of res gestae or integral *609 act evidence "to insure that `the purpose served by admission of other crimes evidence is not to depict the defendant as a bad man, but rather to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.'" State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), (quoting State v. Haarala, 80-2668 (La.1981), ).
  • State v. Lincoln 794 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/01/99), .
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), , police officers stopped the defendant in a vehicle for suspicion of drug activity, and saw a gun on the floorboard of the vehicle.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), , police officers stopped the defendant in a vehicle for suspicion of drug activity, and saw a gun on the floorboard of the vehicle.
  • State v. Williams 779 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Recently, in State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 3-4 (La.10/1/99), -76 , the supreme court discussed the admissibility of res gestae or integral act evidence, it explained: This Court has long approved of the introduction of other crimes evidence, both under the provisions of former R.S.
  • State v. Lowery 781 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), ; State v. Walters, 25,587 (La.App.2d Cir.1/19/94), , appeal after remand, 26,647 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0422 (La.6/16/95), ; State v. Scott, 31,379 (La.
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 4 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Taylor 774 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Donald 775 So. 2d 1054 La. 2000
    See State v. Colomb, 98-02813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ("We have required a close connexity between the charged and uncharged conduct to insure that the purpose served by admission *1059 of other crimes evidence is not to depict the defendant as a bad man, but rather to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in t
  • State v. Clark 780 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    "Unfair prejudice to a criminal defendant `speaks to the capacity of some concededly relevant evidence to lure the factfinder into declaring guilt on a ground different from proof specific to the offense charged.'" State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 5 (La.10/1/99); , quoting, Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 180 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. Morris 770 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See also State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 1-2 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Guillory 773 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    As the court stated in State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99); : The test of integral act evidence is therefore not simply whether the state might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct but whether doing so would deprive its case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, "with power not only to support conclusions but to sustain the willingn
  • State v. Hurst 797 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 4-5 (La.10/1/99), .
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    As in State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 3-4, 5 (La.10/1/99), -1076, 1077 , it is clear the statement invited jurors to draw the necessary inferences for their verdict not on the basis of defendant's bad character, otherwise revealed by evidence of his prior convictions for possession of marijuana, burglary, and theft, but on the basis of his contemporaneous statements acco
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    p. 3 (La.10/1/99), ; State v. Powell, 98-0278, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    [13] In the recent case of State v. Colomb, 98-2813, pp. 4-5 (La.10/1/99), -77 , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted the differing views on whether res gestae evidence is subject to the balancing test of La.
  • State v. Odom 760 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/01/99), .