DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anderson, 732 So. 2d 517.

82 citing documents.

  • Madere v. WESTERN SOUTHERN LIFE INS. CO. 845 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Co., -86 (La.1975), [2] Falgout, supra ; Jackson v. Iberia Parish Gov't, 98-1810 (La.4/16/99), , [3] Also, e.g., see Landreneau, supra .
  • State v. Robinson 846 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    See State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. Vu 846 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1158, pp. 16-17 (La.5/16/00), ( citing State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), ).
  • Ken Lawler Builders, Inc. v. Delaney 840 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    13:4231; Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 98-1810 (La.04/16/99), .
  • Diamond B Const. Co., Inc. v. DOTD 845 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 98-1810, p. 9 (La.4/16/99), ; Terrebonne Fuel, 95-0654, 95-0671 at p. 16, 666 So.2d at 634 .
  • State v. Verdin 845 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), (per curiam); *376 (La.App.
  • Boudreaux v. L.D. Brinkman & Co. 820 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed a case similar to this one in Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 98-1810 (La.4/16/99), .
  • Certified Finance, Inc. v. Cunard 838 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Jackson v. Iberia Parish Gov't, 98-1810, p. 9 (La.4/16/99), ; Terrebonne Fuel, 666 So.2d at 634 .
  • Williams v. BET Const., Inc. 818 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 98-1810 (La.4/16/99), , citing 8 Larson's Workers' Compensation Law § 81.3(a), at 1127, 1132-35 (1998).
  • State v. Kelly 800 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. Johnson 796 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2d Cir.1987) and State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. Rodrigue 795 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Furthermore, in State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that advice with respect to the defendant's sentencing exposure may facilitate the taking of a voluntary guilty plea, but it has never formed part of the core Boykin requirements for the entry of a presumptively valid guilty plea.
  • State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), , the court found, "Advice with respect to the defendant's sentencing exposure may facilitate the taking of a voluntary guilty plea..., but it has never formed part of [the Louisiana Supreme Court's] core Boykin [v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct.
  • State v. Haywood 783 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. Anderson 784 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), (per curiam), the supreme court stated that advice with respect to the defendant's sentencing exposure has never formed part of the core Boykin requirements for the entry of a presumptively valid guilty plea in any case.
  • Critser v. Dillard's Dept. Stores, Inc. 791 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The supreme court reaffirmed the validity of this policy by holding in Jackson v. Iberia Parish Gov't, 98-1810, p. 9 (La.4/16/99), , that where the legislature has expressly provided that an award or judgment can be subject to a claim of modification, res judicata does not apply.
  • State v. Hopkins 774 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    The supreme court in State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), , found that, although advice with respect to a *1185 defendant's sentencing exposure may facilitate the taking of a voluntary guilty plea, see State ex rel.
  • State v. Frickey 769 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. Perkins 762 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    [23] State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), ; State v. Pickett, 99-532 (La.
  • State v. Guzman 769 So. 2d 1158 La. 2000
    State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. Phillips 762 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    However, the supreme court reversed the decision of the second circuit in the per curiam opinion in State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. Demease 756 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    As to the contention that the trial court was required to explain the nature of the charge, we look to the Supreme Court's recent pronouncement in State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • State v. White 756 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    *654 In State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), , which dealt with predicate offenses for third offense DWI, the court cited LaFleur and La.
  • Mercury Aircraft Holdings, Inc. v. Elite Holdings, Inc. 750 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    13:4231; Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 98-1810 (La.4/16/99), .
  • State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    In State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), , which dealt with predicate offenses for DWI, Third, the court cited LaFleur and La.
  • LeBas v. Union Tank Co. 754 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Further, in Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 98-1810, p. 4 (La.4/16/99); , the supreme court reiterated its prior holding by stating, “Matthews determined that the word ‘award’ found in Section 1310.8(B) contemplates that the plaintiff has received a judgment awarding compensation.” In the September 1997 judgment, the workers’ compensation judge dismissed LeBas’ suit with prejudice, r
  • Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    See Jackson v. Iberia Parish Govt., 98-1810, p. 2, n. 1 (La.4/16/99), n. 1 .
  • State v. Flanagan 744 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.1999), ; State v. Gaar, 32,243 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/99), .
  • State v. Pickett 746 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), .
  • Falgout v. Dealers Truck Equipment Co. 748 So. 2d 399 La. 1999
    4/16/99), , which was handed down during the time this court was considering whether to grant Mr. Falgout's application for certiorari, we recognized the language in Landreneau stating that La.
  • State v. Ngo 738 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    but it has never formed part of this Court’s core Boykin requirements for the entry of a presumptively valid guilty plea in any case.” State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), 1999 WL 156254 , (citations omitted).
  • State v. Cajina 740 So. 2d 124 La. 1999
    See State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), (reversing State v. Anderson, 30,901 (La.App.