Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 729 So. 2d 142.

47 citing documents.

State v. Miguel 211 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , (finding that flight by a companion can be imputed to the remaining suspect in determining whether the officers had reasonable suspicion to stop the suspect who did not run).
State v. Brown 32 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith 28 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lazard 2 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. James 980 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 3/3/99), , quoting State v. Smith, 94-1502 p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Craft 870 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 3/3/99), (officer's testimony that he frisked a defendant suspected of drug activity to look for weapons for his own safety was sufficient to validate a frisk pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Bradley 867 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Jones 839 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Foster 828 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Frank 804 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Briley 798 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , , officers patrolling in an area known for drug activity saw the defendant and an unknown man standing together.
State v. Jones 792 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Isidore 789 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Mayberry 791 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Howard 787 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , , 144 quoting State v. Smith, 94-1502 (La.App.
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Julian 785 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/3/99), , quoting State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Frosch 787 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Lewis 782 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Williams 782 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , , the officers were on patrol in an area known for drug activity.
State v. Francois 778 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Devore 776 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Jones 773 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4th Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065 (La.App.
State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Hughes 765 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4th Cir.3/3/99), , 144 quoting State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Thomas 764 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Gray 764 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , , officers patrolling in an area known for drug activity saw the defendant and an unknown man standing together.
State v. Schaffer 767 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Wilson 758 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. *359 3/3/99); ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Myers 756 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
4th Cir.03/03/99), , which upheld the seizure of cocaine from a large bag of individually-wrapped bags felt during a pat-down search based upon the "plain feel" doctrine; State v. Sheehan, 97-2386, (La.App.
State v. Fortier 756 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , , the officers were patrolling in an area known for drug trafficking.
State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Miskell 748 So. 2d 409 La. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , ; State v. Willis, 31,561 (La.App.
State v. Mims 752 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065, p. 3 (La.App.