DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ragas, 744 So. 2d 99.

110 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Michael T. Robinson Denzel West Kirk Powell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    App. 4 Cir. 7/28/99), (internal quotations and citation omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Darren Bridges La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    App. 4 Cir. 7/28/99), -07).
  • State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson AKA Corlious Corall Dyson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Dyson 220 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Miner 163 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , ), the applicable standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence claims is as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine *136 whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fa
  • State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 7/28/99), -07 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, a,n appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 ).
  • State v. Ramirez 154 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -07 ).
  • State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Gordon 146 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -07 ).
  • State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 ).
  • State v. Scott 136 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 ), as follows: 11?In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Taylor 130 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Allen 129 So. 3d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Vargas-Alcerreca 126 So. 3d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 (quoting State v. Egana, 97-0318, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
  • State v. Beaulieu 122 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , ; State v. Johnson, 2011-1343, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -07 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Taylor 118 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 ).
  • State v. Johnson 109 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/28/99), , quoting State v. Egana, 97-0318, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 106 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Joyner 107 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -07 ); see also State v. Kirk, 11-1218, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
  • State v. Kirk 98 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Duncan 91 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Anderson 85 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 ).
  • State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. LeBlanc 76 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State v. Sims 75 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , 106-107 as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 .
  • State of Louisiana v. Alvin Donald Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/28/99), -07 (quoting State v. Egana, 97-318, pp. 5-6, (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 56 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Johnson 22 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Fields 10 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lawrence 5 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Sparkman 5 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Conner 996 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    App. 4 Cir. 7/28/99), , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Agee 990 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Jackson 987 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Shaw 987 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Johnson 985 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , -107 , [2] as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Forbs 983 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Simmons 983 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: *209 In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Lopez 971 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Allen 954 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Dunbar 950 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 7/28/99) , , as follows: *875 In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.