Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hampton, 750 So. 2d 867.

141 citing documents.

State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
art. 821; State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99); , cert.
State v. Williams 119 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
R.S.14:24 and State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 4 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Moran 135 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Vedol 113 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hampton, 98-331 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Magee 110 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. McNair 107 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), , citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Merrill 105 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 821; State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99); , cert.
State v. Boudoin 106 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
14:24 and State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Gray 101 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hunt, 2009-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Bone 107 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
14:24 and State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99)
State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 8/30/02), , writ denied, 02-3090 (La.11/14/03), ; see also State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State Ex. Rel. Hampton v. Cain 82 So. 3d 1241 La. 2012
h JOHNSON, J., would grant this writ application for the same reasons assigned in her dissent in State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.04/23/99), , 892: In the case sub judice, this court has affirmed Defendant’s death conviction despite the prosecution’s unconstitutional suppression of evidence favorable to Defendant.
State v. Pittman 85 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Williamson 81 So. 3d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 821; State v. Hampton, 98-0381, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), , 880 ceri.
State v. Adams 78 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 821; State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Terrance 80 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 821; 3 State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Lewis 74 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.04/23/99) , cert.
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Sander 69 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 12(La.12/1/09), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
[A]s stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), cert.
State v. Trahan 61 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
[A]s stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Bazley 60 So. 3d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 821; State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Furthermore, as stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Wells 45 So. 3d 577 La. 2010
State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09), , citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Collins 43 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Gene Hollier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Hampton, 1998-0331, p. 9 (La.4/23/99)
State v. Hollier 37 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hampton, 1998-0331, p. 9 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Wilson 68 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The trier of fact makes credibility determinations, and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witnesses, State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), , and we have repeatedly held that a factfinder’s credibility decision should not be disturbed unless it is clearly contrary to the evidence.
State Ex Rel. Tt 30 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), .
State ex rel. T.T. 30 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Hunt 25 So. 3d 746 La. 2009
State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Favors 28 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Williams 22 So. 3d 867 La. 2009
State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Thompson 22 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
P. art. 821; State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Palmer 14 So. 3d 304 La. 2009
State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), (“As a general rule, deferential standards of review apply to factual and other trial determinations, while determinations of law are subject to de novo review.”); cf. Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct.
State v. Caffrey 15 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 12 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Perry 9 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99); .
State v. Woodard 9 So. 3d 112 La. 2009
State v. Hampton, 98-0331,- p. 18 (La.4/23/99), (“As a general rule, deferential standards of review apply to factual and other trial determinations, while determinations of law are subject to de novo review.”).
State v. Riggins 13 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
State v. Hampton, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
542 , 145 L.Ed.2d 421 (1999); State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Clifton 997 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 8 (La.4/23/99), ; State ex rel.
State v. Adams 993 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Watson 993 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), , 1148 citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
542 , 145 L.Ed.2d 421 (1999); State v. Hampton, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Bedou 985 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99); .