Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sartain, 746 So. 2d 837.

25 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Eric E Irons La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Terry James Goodeaux -Aka- Terry Goodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
4th Cir.12/1/99), see also United States v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 95 (2d Cir.2002); United States v. Kliti, 156 F.3d 150, 153 (2d Cir.1998).
State v. Whitlock 207 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
4th Cir. 12/01/99), , writ denied, 00-0341 (La.
State v. Griffin 176 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 12/1/99) , , this Court reviewed the relevant jurisprudence under La.
State v. Lewis 161 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Ruffin 82 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 12/1/99) , , this Court reviewed the relevant jurisprudence as follows: *509 When a witness refers directly or indirectly to another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant, as to which evidence is not admissible, the defendant’s remedy is a request for an admonition or a mistrial pursuant to LSA-
State v. Green 69 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Adams 976 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 12/1/99) , , this court reviewed the relevant jurisprudence as follows: When a witness refers directly or indirectly to another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant, as to which evidence is not admissible, the defendant's remedy is a request for an admonition or a mistrial pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.
State v. Sosa 948 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 12/1/99) , , writ denied, 00-0341 (La.9/15/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Jason M. Reeves La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
4th Cir.12/1/99), see also United States v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 95 (2d Cir.2002); United States v. Kliti, 156 F.3d 150, 153 (2d Cir.1998).
State v. Reeves 890 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4th Cir.12/1/99), ; see also United States v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 95 (2d Cir.2002); United States v. Kliti, 156 F.3d 150, 153 (2d Cir.1998).
State v. Cisco 861 So. 2d 118 La. 2003
4th Cir.12/1/99), ; see also United States v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 95 (2d Cir.2002); United States v. Kliti, 156 F.3d 150, 153 (2d Cir.1998).
State v. Woodard 799 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
4th Cir.12/1/99), , rehearing denied, writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/15/00), ], joint motions for continuance with the state [ State v. Simpson (La.App.
State v. Briley 798 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
12/1/99), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Mayberry 791 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 784 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 12/1/99) , , unit denied, 2000-0341 (La.9/15/00), .
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 12/1/99) , , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/15/00), .
State v. Frosch 787 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 12/13/99) ; this court considered a testifying officer’s comments that the defendant was living in a crack house and using drugs.
State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000