Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bright, 776 So. 2d 1134.

159 citing documents.

State v. Holley 799 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
In State v. Bright, 98-0398, pp. 40-41 (La.4/11/00); , the supreme court set forth the standard for reviewing such claims, in stating: A criminal defendant is guaranteed the effective assistance of counsel.
State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
[8] [9] 98-398 (La.4/11/00); .
State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Flagg 792 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Bright, 98-0398 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Mince, 97-2947 (La.5/29/98), .
State v. Jones 792 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Bright, 98-0398, (La.4/11/00), .
State ex rel. WM 794 So. 2d 801 La. 2001
See State v. Bright, 98-0398 (La.4/11/00)
State v. Carter 787 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
14:64; State v. Bright, 98-0398 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Dyer 794 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In State v. Bright, 98-398 (La.4/11/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *9 An identification procedure is suggestive if it unduly focuses a witness's attention on the suspect.
State v. Johnson 775 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 10 (La.4/11/00), .