Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guillard, 736 So. 2d 273.

29 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 97 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Blazio 44 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Holland 13 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 4/7/99), , 276: |7To support a conviction for possession of cocaine, the State must prove that the defendant was in possession of the illegal drug and that he knowingly possessed it.
  • State of Louisiana v. Roland A. Authement, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 4/7/99), the appellate court stated, “[t]he elements of knowledge and intent are states of mind and need not be proven as facts, but rather may be inferred from the circumstances.
  • State v. Authement 950 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 4/7/99), , the appellate court stated, "[t]he elements of knowledge and intent are states of mind and need not be proven as facts, but rather may be inferred from the circumstances.
  • State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , the defendant argued that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a mistrial due to *1123 the erroneous instructions gratuitously given to the jury regarding sentencing.
  • State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , the defendant argued that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a mistrial due to *1123 the erroneous instructions gratuitously given to the jury regarding sentencing.
  • State v. Skipper 906 So. 2d 399 La. 2005
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , the defendant was charged with possession of cocaine.
  • State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , ; State v. Handy, 00-0051 (La.App.
  • State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , this court affirmed the defendant’s conviction for attempted possession of cocaine where a police officer testified that he retrieved a crack pipe from the defendant’s pants pocket and that the pipe appeared to contain cocaine residue.
  • State v. Richardson 830 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 4/7/99), , found in a situation similar to the instant case, where appellant argued that the trial court erred in giving instructions to the jury regarding the sentencing range for attempted possession of cocaine, where defendant was a third felony offender not eligible for probation, that: ...
  • State v. Lipscomb 823 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Council 802 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , as follows: The standard of review for the sufficiency of the evidence is whether, viewing the evidence in a light most favor *973 able to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found that the State proved the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Knight 794 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , this court affirmed the defendant's conviction for attempted possession of cocaine where the arresting officer seized a metal crack pipe from one of the defendant's pants pockets.
  • State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Henderson 775 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    See State v. Guillard, 98-0504, pp. 3-4 (La.App.4th Cir.4/7/99), -77 , and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Commodore 774 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , the arresting officer testified that a crack pipe recovered from the defendant appeared to contain cocaine residue.
  • State v. Echols 774 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.4/7/99), ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER 4 In his final assignment of error the defendant argues that counsel was ineffective for advising him to accept the plea agreement without advocating drug treatment for him.
  • State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Toca 769 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Walker 764 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Guillard, 98-0504 (4th Cir. 4/7/99), .
  • State v. Prater 762 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , ; State v. Jones, 97-2217, (La.App.
  • State v. Monette 758 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , this court affirmed the defendant's conviction for attempted possession of cocaine where the arresting officer seized a metal crack pipe from one of the defendant's pants pockets.
  • State v. Lee 755 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lewis 755 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Drummer 750 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 4/7/99) , , this court affirmed the defendant's conviction for attempted possession of cocaine where the arresting officer seized a metal crack pipe from one of the defendant's pants pockets.
  • State v. Shields 743 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Porter 740 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999