Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Deruise, 802 So. 2d 1224.

156 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Steve Derozal Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Devin Owen Porter, Jr La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Alonzo W. Ford AKA "lonnie" AKA "lon" AKA "lonz" AKA "big Ford" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Gary L. Workman La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Ralph Haire La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jordan D. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Const. art. I, § 19 ensures the right to an appeal based upon a complete record of the evidence on which a judgment is based, the Louisiana Supreme Court has explained that “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal, as an incomplete record may nonetheless be adequate for appellate review.” State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 11 (La.4/3/01), cert.
State of Louisiana Versus Perry Bell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Nancy Rogers A/K/A Nancy Lynn Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
749, 773 (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was “easily ascertainable from the record” without regard to the unrecorded side-bar discussion); State v. Deruise, 98-0541, pp. 9-15 (La.4/3/01), -37 (failure to record bench conferences in which the prosecutor and defense counsel made their peremptory and cause challenges did not
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Barnes Derrick Groves La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Terance Roshell Dawson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Matthew L. Magrini La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
4/3/01), (citing Hardy v. United States, 375 U.S. 277, 84 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4/3/01), ], the transcript of voir dire includes the questioning 55 of each prospective juror, from which it can be determined if there was a basis for any challenges for cause that the defense may have brought and may have be
State v. Quinn 275 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 265 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4/3/01), , 1236, as follows: This court has never articulated a per se rule either requiring the recording of bench conferences or exempting them from the scope of La.C.Cr.
State v. Mullen 269 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Handy 259 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/3/01), , 1233-1237 (missing bench conferences in which the parties made their challenges for cause and their peremptory challenges did not prejudice the defense because the record contained a jury strike sheet reflecting who challenged each prospective juror, and the transcript of voir dire revealed a substantial basis for d
State v. Molette 258 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hicks 258 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Vaughn 259 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Maize 223 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Moore 215 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
State v. Steward 213 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
4/3/01), ; State v. York, 48,230 (La.App.
State v. Lacaze 208 So. 3d 856 La. 2016
4/3/01), , which was also pending on appeal when Simmons was overturned, and in which the Court rejected the defendant’s claim that an NOPD officer was erroneously seated on the jury, because in ' Demise the juror at issue disclosed his law enforcement experience and thereby enabled the parties to question him about poss
State v. Murphy 206 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Jones 203 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , the Supreme *786 Court reviewed a complaint by a defendant regarding alleged deficiencies in his appellate record- The Court stated: Both in this court and the United States Supreme Court have made clear that a criminal defendant has a right to a complete transcript of the trial proceed-ings_ Further, in Louisiana
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Ingram La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“Initially we note that ineffective assistance of counsel claims are usually addressed in post-conviction proceedings, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Deruise, 1998-0541[,] p. 35 (La.4/3/01), -1248, cert.
State v. Ingram 181 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“Initially we note that ineffective assistance of counsel claims are .usually addressed in post-conviction proceedings, rather than on direct appeal.” State v. Deruise, 1998-0541[,] p. 35 (La.4/3/01), -1248 , cert.
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 34 (La.4/3/01), ; State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 8 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Dabney 176 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 7 (La.4/3/01), (citations omitted).
State v. Butler 171 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the considerations a trial court must take into account in determining whether to sever offenses: A motion to sever is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of an abuse of discretion.
State v. Woodberry 171 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
|12In State v. Deruise, 98-541, p. 7 (La.4/3/01), , the Court discussed the standard for reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to sever counts: A motion to sever is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of an abuse of discretion.
State v. Jenkins 172 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 34 (La.4/3/01), -48 ; State v. Thomas, 12-1410, p. 5 (La.9/4/13), .
State v. Workman 170 So. 3d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 26 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State in the Interest of J.C.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 11 (La.4/3/01), cert.
State ex rel. J.C.R. 157 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 11 (La.4/3/01), , cert, denied, 534 U.S. 926 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Griffin 167 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Porter 151 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the defendant’s claim that the record was incomplete |17where the court reporter did not record bench conferences during jury selection, finding, “the defendant has not demonstrated any specific prejudice which he suffered as a result of those conferences not being transcribed; n
State v. Richardson 142 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Warner 137 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Court discussed the standard for reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to sever counts in State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 7 (La.4/3/01), , 1232: A motion to sever is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of an abuse of discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 11 (La.4/3/01), cert.
State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 11 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Murphy 131 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Phillips 130 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Deruise, 98-541 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Deruise, 98-0541, pp. 10-11 (La.4/3/01), ; Landry, 97-0499, 751 So.2d at 215 .
State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Deruise, 98-0541 (La.4/3/01), , cert.