Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nogess, 729 So. 2d 132.

61 citing documents.

State v. Thomas 764 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Gray 764 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Dorsey 763 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Rodriguez 753 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Shapiro 751 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , ; State v. O'Shea, 97-0400 (La.App.
State v. Green 750 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Hankton, 96-1538, (La.App.
State v. Martello 748 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Hunter, 92-2535 (La.
State v. Gipson 747 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99), ; State v. Hankton, 96-1538, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Johnson 748 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Perez 745 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
App. 4 Cir. 3/3/99), , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Booth 745 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/3/99) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.