Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 729 So. 2d 95.
- State v. Francois 134 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
State v. Everett
96 So. 3d 605
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 2/23/99), , citing Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., Inc., the court noted that the Louisiana Supreme Court previously explained a present sense | ^impression exception to the general rule against admitting hearsay, finding, “[t]he statement may follow ‘immediately’ after perceiving an event, allo
- Williams v. Asbestos 95 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State v. Escobar-Rivera
90 So. 3d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 2/23/99), , citing State v. McCorkle, 97-966 (La.App.
-
State v. Moses
932 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 2/23/99) , , citing Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., Inc., this Court noted that the Louisiana Supreme Court previously explained a present sense impression exception to the general rule against admitting hearsay, finding, "[t]he statement may follow `immediately' after perceiving an event, allowi
-
State v. Fleming
902 So. 2d 451
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 2/23/99) , (citation omitted).
- State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
- State v. Elliott 896 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
- State v. Falkins 880 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
- State v. Redditt 868 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. Royal 857 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Taylor 841 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. Stacker 836 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- State v. Petty 759 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-
State v. Ditcharo
739 So. 2d 957
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 2/23/99) , , 1999 WL 89726 .