DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Raymond, 718 So. 2d 1010.

15 citing documents.

  • State v. Phillips 130 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Williams 128 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Besse 83 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Robair 72 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 8/25/98), , this Court held that the state's failure to prove the date the defendant was discharged from custody on one of the predicate offenses is an error patent that should be considered by the appellate court, since it relates to sufficiency of the evidence.
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 8/25/98), , this Court held that the state’s failure to prove the date the defendant was discharged from custody on one of the predicate offenses is an error patent that should be considered by the appellate court, since it relates to sufficiency of the evidence.
  • State v. Harbor 817 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5th Cir.8/25/98), ; State v. Brown, 98-938 (La.App.
  • State v. Wilson 790 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Harris 782 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Ballay 757 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jones 757 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Mayer 743 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5th Cir. 8/25/98), ; State v. Brown, 98-938 (La.App.
  • State v. Bates 742 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    5th Cir. 8/25/98), ; State v. Simmons, 95-309 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 732 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    App. 5th Cir. 8/25/98), , this Court held that the state's failure to prove the date the defendant was discharged from custody on one of the predicate offenses is an error patent that should be considered by the appellate court, since it relates to sufficiency of the evidence.