Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robinson, 744 So. 2d 119.

70 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 8/11/99), State v. Martin, 97-0319, p. 1 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Simuel Shaw Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Degregory 274 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 8/11/99), , 125 ).
State v. Galle 267 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 240 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 8/11/99), , 126.
State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App, 4 Cir. 8/11/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Danial Lewayne Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lee Lafleur -Aka- Danial Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Lafleur 209 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Watson 147 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 8/11/99) , , defense counsel argues, a finding of ineffective counsel by failure to object to the sentence as excessive or to move for reconsideration, where the trial court does not state its reasons for sentencing, may be grounds for remand.
State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 8/11/99), , quoting State v. Anderson, 97-2587, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. McCarthy 112 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Jones 99 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Colvin 65 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Summers 52 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 8/11/99), ; State v. Martin, 97-0319, p. 1 (La.App.
State v. Ferguson 43 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Austin Blake Ceaser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 08/11/99); ” This court has previously discussed the standard for reviewing excessive sentence claims: [Louisiana Constitution Article] I, § 20 guarantees that, “[n]o law shall subject any person to cruel or unusual punishment.” To constitute an excessive sentence, the reviewing court must find
State v. Ceaser 21 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 08/11/99); .” This court has previously discussed the standard for reviewing excessive sentence claims: [Louisiana Constitution Article] I, § 20 guarantees that, “[n]o law shall subject any person to cruel or unusual punishment.” To constitute an excessive sentence, the reviewing court must find the penalty so grossly disproport
State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Dunbar 981 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 8/11/99), , *1114 126.
State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Jackson 947 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 8/11/99), ; State v. Jackson, 1997-2220, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Reichard 935 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Hulbert 852 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 8/11/99), ; State v. Martin, 97-0319, p. 1 (La.App.
State v. Bell 854 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Doleman 835 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Woods 830 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Woodberry 820 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Keeley 814 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 8/11/99) , ; State v. Martin, 97-0319, p. 1 (La.App.
State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Broyard 802 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001