DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thibodeaux, 750 So. 2d 916.

146 citing documents.

  • State v. Ashford 878 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Genter 872 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    [2] See also State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , where the Court found independent evidence established the murder, and the defendant's confession was sufficient to establish the aggravating circumstance.
  • State v. Harris 871 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Ford 867 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
    This Court affirmed his conviction and death sentence in State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Billy Frank Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    9/8/99), State v. Miller, 99-950 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 866 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    See also State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Miller, 99-950 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 864 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. LeBlanc 862 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 pp. 20-21 (La.9/8/99), , certiorari denied sub nom., Thibodeaux v. Louisiana, 529 U.S. 1112 , 120 S.Ct.
  • State v. Harold 861 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 20-21, (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. McLelland 860 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Thibodeaux, 99-1673, p. 12 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Harris 859 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    Duncan at p. 38 , 802 So.2d at 559; Deal at 17 , 802 So.2d at 1268; State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 36 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Letulier, 97-1360, p. 27 (La.7/8/98), ; State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 31 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Ortiz, 96-1609, p. 23 (La.10/21/97), ; State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 19 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Davis, 92-1623, pp. 34-35 (La.5/23/94), -31 .
  • State v. Franklin 858 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 40 (La.5/14/02), ___ So.2d ___, ___; State v. Deal, 00-0434, p. 17 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 38 (La.10/16/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 36 (La.4/23/99), ; Letulier , 97-1360 at p. 27, 750 So.2d at 800 ; State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 31 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Ortiz, 96-1609, p. 23 (La.10/21/97), ; Connolly, 96-1680 at p. 19, 700 So.2d at 823; State v. Davis, 92-1623, p. 35 (La.5/23/94), .
  • State v. Shepard 850 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [3] State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Haynes 847 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Jackson 846 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Smith 844 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [3] State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Wright 839 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    [3] State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99); .
  • State v. Lee 840 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 pp. 20-21 (La.9/8/99), , certiorari denied sub nom.
  • State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
    See State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, pp. 14-15 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 15 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Alexander 829 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Lee 826 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Hunt 797 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    art. 821(B); State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Adger 797 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    art. 821B; State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Johnson 796 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    art. 821(B); State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, pp. 20-21 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, pp. 20-21 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Smith 793 So. 2d 1199 La. 2001
    Finally, in State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 15 (La.9/8/99), , we further refined our review of sentencing phase errors in capital cases by holding that, for those errors not barred from review by Wessinger because of the lack of a contemporaneous objection, the defendant must show not only that an error occurred, but also that it was of "such magnitude that it undermines
  • State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 12/6/00), -62 , this Court discussed the pertinent law relating to suggestive identifications: The law regarding the admissibility of identification testimony was recently summarized in State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert,.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Biglane, 99-111 (La.App.
  • State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), ; La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    The law regarding the admissibility of identification testimony was recently summarized in State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), , cert.
  • State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    See State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 12 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/08/99), , cert.
  • State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673 (La.9/8/99), State v. Williams, 230 La.
  • State v. Carter 762 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    See State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 17 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 15 (La.9/8/99) ("in the context of Rule 28 review, the existence of an arbitrary factor requires this court to find an error of such magnitude that it undermines confidence in the jury's verdict, essentially the same kind of error that would support the prejudice prong under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.