DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martello, 748 So. 2d 1192.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. Luzzo 214 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Halley 212 So. 3d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4 Cir. 11/17/99), , citing State v. Buffington, 97-2423, p. 9 (La.App.
  • State v. Caliste 125 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Buhcannon 112 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 11/17/99), ; State v. Jones, 98-0963, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Stovall 102 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 11/17/99), , 1199 and State v. Robinson, 2009-0922, p. 2 (La.App.
  • State v. Cyrus 97 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Robinson 81 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 11/17/99), -02 (citing State v. Lorio, 94-2591, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Brown 56 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 11/17/99) , , the trial court adjudicated the defendant a third-felony habitual offender.
  • State v. Johnson 44 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Woodfork 981 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 11/17/99) , ; State v. Cager, 97-1877 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    App. 4 Cir. 11/17/99), ; State v. Cager, 97-1877 (La.App.
  • State v. Francois 884 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    App. 4 Cir. 11/17/99), , we noted that "[t]he expiration of the previous sentence is determined by the date of the actual discharge from supervision by the Department of Corrections."
  • State v. Young 863 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 11/17/99) , -03 , this Court reviewed jurisprudence where the State failed to affirmatively prove a discharge date but relied upon courts making instead theoretical calculations: (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 822 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 11/17/99), , this Court stated: This Court set forth the applicable law pertaining to out-of-court identifications in State v. Brown, 98-0510, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.11/17/99), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/15/00), .
  • State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 11/17/99) , , writ denied, 2000-0240 (La.12/15/00), .
  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 11/17/99) , ; State v. Short, 96-2780 (La.App.
  • State v. Banks 779 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 11/17/99) , ; State v. Short, 96-2780 (La.App.
  • State v. Campbell 778 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 11/17/99) , , this Court reviewed the multiple bill sentence where the defense counsel said that the defendant did not want to delay his appeal but maintained an objection to the habitual offender proceedings.
  • State v. McZeal 779 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Odom 772 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Gray 764 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000