Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hobley, 752 So. 2d 771.
-
State v. Snyder
942 So. 2d 484
La. 2006
12/15/99), ("Notably, trial counsel neither disputed the explanations of inattentiveness given by the prosecutor nor developed a record of evidence contradicting those explanations.").
-
State v. Thomas
938 So. 2d 1178
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Id,.; State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Robertson
927 So. 2d 629
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
*639 Regarding requests for counsel, the supreme court stated in State v. Hobley, 98-2460, p. 29 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Qualls
921 So. 2d 226
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), .
-
State v. Kenner
917 So. 2d 1081
La. 2005
See State v. Hobley, 99-3343, p. 25 n. 10 (La.12/8/99), ("`There is no Brady violation where a defendant knew or should have known the essential facts permitting him to take advantage of any exculpatory information, or where the evidence is available from another source, because in such cases there is really nothing for the government to disclose.'")(quoting Coe v. Be
-
State v. Juniors
915 So. 2d 291
La. 2005
State v. Hobley, 98-2460, p. 19 (La.12/15/99), .
-
State v. Parker
901 So. 2d 513
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Robinson
896 So. 2d 1115
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Gray
891 So. 2d 1260
La. 2005
See State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), .
-
State v. Bailey
875 So. 2d 949
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Hobley, 98-2460, pp. 19-20 (La.12/5/99), , cert.
-
State v. Crawford
873 So. 2d 768
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Alexander
871 So. 2d 483
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[6] In State v. Hobley, 98-2460, p. 22 (La.12/15/99), -785 , cert.
-
State v. Pugh
831 So. 2d 341
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
art. 643; State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Louviere
833 So. 2d 885
La. 2002
In State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99) , a defendant argued that the state possessed his mental health records or at least was aware that he was receiving treatment.
-
State v. Murray
827 So. 2d 488
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Loyd
810 So. 2d 1214
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Ball
824 So. 2d 1089
La. 2002
State v. Hobley, 98-2460, p. 18 (La.12/15/99), .
-
State v. Hutchinson
803 So. 2d 1120
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Joseph
802 So. 2d 735
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Hobley, 98-2460, p. 18 (La.12/15/99), , cert.
-
State v. Jacobs
803 So. 2d 933
La. 2001
State v. Hobley, 98-2460, p. 18 (La.12/15/99), .
-
State v. Schmidt
771 So. 2d 131
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99); .
-
State v. Tilley
767 So. 2d 6
La. 2000
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), .
-
State v. Wommack
770 So. 2d 365
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Hobley, 98-2460, p. 33 (La.12/15/99); .
-
State v. Wade
758 So. 2d 987
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hobley, 98-2460 (La.12/15/99), According to the state, Clarence Bell was the only jury venireman who put only his name and address on the questionnaire.