DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hardy, 715 So. 2d 466.

22 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Gary L. Workman La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State v. Workman 170 So. 3d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Henderson 58 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Falcon 956 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • Reaux v. Louisiana Bd. of Medical Examiners 850 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Lewis 815 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 5/13/98) , ; State v. Francis, supra .
  • State v. Stewart 803 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Calvin 781 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 5/13/98) , (citations omitted), this Court explained: The Louisiana Constitution in Article 1, Section 20, prohibits the imposition of excessive punishment.
  • State v. Lee 778 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 5/13/98), , (La.App.
  • State v. Weaver 775 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jackson 767 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 5/13/98) , , this court explained: The Louisiana Constitution in Article 1, Section 20, prohibits the imposition of excessive punishment.
  • State v. Jolly 768 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Walker 773 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 5/13/98) , ; State v. Tran, 97-640 (La.App.
  • State v. Alford 765 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Long 744 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Noel 734 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    5 Cir.5/13/98), ; State v. Bell, supra.
  • State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Petta 729 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Francis 727 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 5/13/98) , , this Court explained the respective burdens of proof when the defense urges entrapment as follows: The entrapment defense is composed of two elements: 1) an inducement by a state agent to commit an offense, and 2) lack of predisposition to commit the offense on the part of the defendant.
  • State v. Medious 722 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    5 Cir. 5/13/98) , , 1998 WL 236297 .
  • State v. Radacker 722 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998