Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hoffman, 768 So. 2d 542.

151 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. (La.4/11/00)
State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 49 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Neely 3 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), -87 , _|_6,cert.
State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
and objections, questions, statements, and arguments of counsel.” State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 50 (La.4/11/00)
State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 50 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
Appellate counsel suggests that this Court reconsider its ruling in State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, pp. 33-34 (La.4/11/00), -74 , in which the Court held that a limiting instruction on heinousness could cure the constitutional infirmity of vagueness as to that aggravator.
State v. Logan 986 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
[9] See State v. Frank, 99-0553, pp. 16-17 (La.1/17/01), -17 (110 out of 113 venire members (97%) had been exposed to some publicity surrounding the case, and 89% of the prospective jurors indicated they had been exposed to information about the case on more than one occasion or from multiple sources); State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 9 (La.4/11/00), (72 out of 90 prospective jurors (80%) had awareness of the case before trial); State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 5 (La.7/1/97), (although 120 out of 139
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
Draughn, XXXX-XXXX p. 63-64, 950 So.2d at 625 , citing State v. Hoffman, XXXX-XXXX p. 50 (La.4/11/00), -587 , cert.
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
ue that community considered); State v. Frank, 99-0553, 803 So.2d at 16-17 (change of venue not required when 110 out of 113 venire members (97.3%) "had been exposed to some publicity surrounding the case" and 89% of the prospective jurors indicated that they had been exposed to information about the case on more than one occasion or from multiple sources); State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), (denial of venue change not abuse of discretion when 72 out of 90 prospective jurors (80%) had aware
State v. Vincent 978 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[11] See, State v. Hoffman, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Montz 968 So. 2d 727 La. 2007
See also Hoffman, 98-3118 at p. 9, , cert.
State v. Pinion 968 So. 2d 131 La. 2007
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 50 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Lang 960 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), -1609 (La.6/14/00), , U.S. cert.
State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson 957 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
See, State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 15 (La.4/11/00), -560 [5] , and the cases cited therein.
State v. Edwards 957 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), -560 , cert.
State v. Montz 954 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
art. 622; State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 5 (La.4/11/2000) (citations omitted); cert denied, 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
State v. Hoffman, XXXX-XXXX p. 50 (La.4/11/00), -587 , cert.
State v. Scott 952 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 49 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Nathan Stringer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4/11/00), stating: The State is entitled to the moral force of its evidence, and post-mortem photographs of murder victims are admissible to prove corpus delicti, to corroborate other evidence establishing cause of death, as well as location, and placement of wounds, and to provide positive
State v. Stringer 949 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court considered a similar issue in State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , stating: The State is entitled to the moral force of its evidence, and post-mortem photographs of murder victims are admissible to prove corpus delicti, to corroborate other evidence establishing cause of death, as well as location, and placement of wounds, and to provide positive identification of the victim.
State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , this court approved a death penalty when two jurors, who initially stated that they could not consider the defendant's youth and lack of criminal history as mitigating circumstances, eventually agreed they could consider all factors presented in the penalty phase and could consider a life sentence.
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
Manning , XXXX-XXXX p. 7, 885 So.2d at 1061 ; State v. Hoffman, XXXX-XXXX p. 5 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State v. Heard 917 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Hoffman, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/11/00), , cert.
State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
See State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 38 (La.4/11/00), (counsel's decisions as to which motions to file form a part of trial strategy); State v. Smith, 94-0621 (La.App.
State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
The failure to file a motion to-quash, which as here, would likely lead only to re-indictment, can properly be assigned to “trial strategy.” See State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 38 (La.4/11/00), (counsel’s decisions as to which motions to file form a part of trial strategy); State v. Smith, 94-0621 (La.App.
State v. Parker 901 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 p. 33-34 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), -53 , cert.
State v. Stein 874 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[26] 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State v. George 855 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
2031 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975); State v. Clark, supra ; State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.04/11/00), , cert.
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
2031, 2037 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975), State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State v. Saltzman 843 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
“Generally, probable cause for a warrantless arrest exists when facts and circumstances known to an arresting officer, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.” State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00); , opinion amended on other grounds, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00); , cert.
State v. Bradford 846 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 38 (La.4/11/00), (counsel's decisions as to which motions to file form a part of trial strategy); State v. Smith, 94-0621 (La.App.
State v. Parent 836 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
283 , 151 L.Ed.2d 208 (2001); State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Juarbe 824 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 49 (La.4/11/00), ; see State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 9-10 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Langley 813 So. 2d 356 La. 2002
See State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), (counsel's decisions as to which motions to file form a part of trial strategy); State v. Smith, 94-0621 (La.App.
State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 49 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
2031, 2037 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975), State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
In State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , this court approved a death penalty when two jurors, who initially stated that they could not consider the defendant's youth and lack of criminal history as mitigating circumstances, eventually agreed they could consider all factors presented in the penalty phase and could consider a life sentence.
State v. Goodley 774 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
See, e.g., State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00); , also State v. Smith, 94-388 (La.
State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00); .
State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
1483 , 137 L.Ed.2d 694 (1997) (same); see also State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, pp. 22-24 (La.4/11/00), -66 ..
State v. Wilson 773 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 49 (La.4/11/00), (citations and footnote omitted), cert.
State v. Morris 770 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 5 (La.4/11/2000), ; cert.
State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
In State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , this court approved a death penalty when *405 two jurors, who initially stated that they could not consider the defendant's youth and lack of criminal history as mitigating circumstances, eventually agreed they could consider all factors presented in the penalty phase and could consider a life sentence.
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 15 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Hobley, supra at 783-84 .