Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lisotta, 726 So. 2d 57.

263 citing documents.

State v. Stephan 79 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Tony E. Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), (), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. Washington 76 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), (), writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State of Louisiana v. A. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. J.S. 63 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , the fifth circuit set forth the standard for reviewing a trial court’s sentencing discretion, as follows: a reviewing court should consider the nature of the crime, the nature and background of the offender, and the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the same co
State v. A.D.L. 64 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , the defendant was resentenced to six years imprisonment.
State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Morris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. Morris 63 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , provided three factors to be considered by a court in reviewing a trial judge’s sentencing discretion: (1) the nature of the crime; (2) the nature and background of the offender; and, (3) the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the same court and other courts
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lee Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), the fifth circuit held that a reviewing court should consider three factors in reviewing sentences imposed by the trial court: (1) “the nature of the crime,” (2) “the nature and background of the offender, and” (3) “the sentence imposed for
State v. Guillory 61 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , the fifth circuit held that a reviewing court should consider three factors in reviewing sentences imposed by the trial court: (1) “the nature of the crime,” (2) “the nature and background of the offender, and” (3) “the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the
State of Louisiana v. Margaret Ann Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), suggested that: The court should consider three factors in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion: 1.
State of Louisiana v. J.P. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), suggested that: The court should consider three factors in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion: 1.
State v. J.P.F. 58 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , suggested that: The court should consider three factors in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion: 1.
State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), suggested that: The court should consider three factors in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion: 1.
State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-483 (La.6/25/99), , suggested that: The court should consider three factors in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion: 1.
State of Louisiana v. Deanna Gaspard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), the fifth circuit held that a reviewing court should consider three factors in reviewing sentences imposed by the trial court: (1) “the nature of the crime,” (2) “the nature and background of the offender, and” (3) “the sentence imposed for
State v. Gaspard 49 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , the fifth circuit held that a reviewing court should consider three factors in reviewing sentences imposed by the trial court: (1) “the nature of the crime,” (2) “the nature and background of the offender, and” (3) “the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Paul Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. Jacobs 48 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , set forth three factors to be considered by the reviewing court in determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing a defendant.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge's sentencing discretion.
State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Darrell James Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/16/98), [58], writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State of Louisiana v. Theron J. Chaisson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. Chaisson 20 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), , the fifth circuit held that a reviewing court should consider three factors in reviewing sentences imposed by the trial court: (1) “the nature of the crime,” (2) “the nature and background of the offender, and” (3) “the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the
State of Louisiana v. Maryln A. Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), we annunciated three factors that a reviewing court should take into consideration in abuse of discretion cases: (1) the nature of the crime; (2) the nature and background of the offender; and (3) the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the same court and other co
State v. LeBlanc 12 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , we annunciated three factors that a reviewing court should take into consideration in abuse of discretion cases: (1) the nature of the crime; (2) the nature and background of the offender; and (3) the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the same court and other
State of Louisiana v. Robert Elijah Lamar Mincey AKA - Robert Bryant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), [58], writ denied, 99-0433 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Randall J. Morain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), we annunciated three factors that a reviewing court should take into consideration in abuse of discretion cases: (1) the nature of the crime; (2) the nature and background of the offender; and (3) the sentence imposed for simila
State v. Morain 11 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , |4writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , we annunciated three factors that a reviewing court should take into consideration in abuse of discretion cases: (1) the nature of the crime; (2) the nature and background of the offender; and (3) the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the same court and othe
State v. Mincey 12 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , [58], writ denied 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , our colleagues on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted three factors the appellate court should consider in reviewing a judge’s sentencing discretion.
State v. HLJ 6 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. H.L. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. H.L.J. 6 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), ( State v. Richmond, 97-1225 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. James M. Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Recent jurisprudence was reviewed for sentences involving similar crimes, the third and last factor to consider under Lisotta
State v. Baker 3 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Recent jurisprudence was reviewed for sentences involving similar crimes, the third and last factor to consider under Lisotta, .
State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State of Louisiana v. T. V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. TV 993 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Randall J. Morain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-0433 (La.
State v. Morain 981 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98) , , writ denied, 99-0433 (La.6/25/99), , we annunciated three factors that a reviewing court should take into consideration in abuse of discretion cases: (1) the nature of the crime; (2) the nature and background of the offender; and (3) the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the same court and other
State of Louisiana v. Randall Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Walter R. Cox, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98), writ denied, 99-433 (La.
State v. Cox 974 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 12/16/98), , writ denied, 99-433 (La.6/25/99), (citations omitted).