Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Herrera, 729 So. 2d 75.

17 citing documents.

  • State v. Harmon 274 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 5 Cir. 2/10/99), , 80.
  • State v. Carter 96 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Goodwin 908 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Williams 904 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5th Cir.2/10/99), , the defendant attempted to leave a store with merchandise without paying.
  • State v. Armant 839 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Ruffin 836 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Pierre 827 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Morris 798 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Coleman 792 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 2/10/99) , (citing State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), ).
  • State v. Price 792 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 2/10/99) , ; State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
  • State v. Weidenbacker 782 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 2/10/99) , , witnesses testified at trial that the defendant *1045 attempted to exit the store with merchandise for which she had not paid.
  • State v. Hampton 782 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    As in State v. Herrera, 98-677, p. 7 (La.App.5 Cir. 2/10/99), -79 , the circumstances of the crime evidently led the trial judge to believe that defendant was not an innocent bystander regarding the entire amount of stolen goods in the truck.
  • State v. Harbor 775 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Brooks 769 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Vortisch 763 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5th Cir. 2/10/99), ; State v. Brual, 98-657 (La.
  • State v. Maise 759 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000