DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rochon, 733 So. 2d 624.

29 citing documents.

  • Lanard Lavigne Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    .App. 5 Cir. 3/10/99), State v. Ayo, 08-468 (La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Robert Javontie Marks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
  • State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 3/10/99), (finding the trial court’s statement merely clarified the prosecutor’s questions of the witness).
  • State of Louisiana v. Ashaki Okung Kelly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Kelly 153 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Broome 136 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See State v. Colligan, supra; State v. Rochon, 98-717 (La.App.5th Cir.3/10/99), ; State v. Walker, supra.
  • State v. Simmons 136 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Berroa-Reyes 109 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Massey 71 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 3/10/99) , , defendant alleged that the trial court erred by allowing highly prejudicial testimony from Sergeant Bruce Harrison, among other things; however, defendant did not object to it at trial.
  • State of Louisiana v. Vincent Marinello La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Marinello 49 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Ayo 7 So. 3d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Vincent 978 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Froiland 910 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 3/10/99) , -630 , this Court reviewed comments made by the trial court absent an objection by the defendant.
  • State v. Glenn 900 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 3/10/99) , [15] Id.
  • State v. Wright 896 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5th Cir.3/10/99), ; State v, Major, 02-0133 (La.App.
  • State v. Fernandez 864 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Farhood 844 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 3/10/99) , this Court addressed the issue: The combined effect of assignments of error, none of which warrant reversal, do not deprive a defendant of the right to a constitutionally fair trial.
  • State v. Amin 839 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Major 829 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    9 | ]4A similar relevancy argument was asserted by the defendant in State v. Rochon, 98-717 (La.App.5 Cir.3/10/99), .
  • State v. Little 768 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 3/10/99) , -630 .
  • State v. Day 762 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Simmons 759 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Ballay 757 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 3/10/99) , , This Court reviewed comments made by the trial court absent an objection by defendant.
  • State v. Norman 756 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5th Cir.3/10/99), ; State v. Francis, 95-194 (La.App.
  • State v. Blanchard 749 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 3/10/99), at 630 .
  • State v. Hester 746 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Simmons 738 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 3/10/99), ; State v. Johnson, 98-281, p. 8 (La.App.