Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Barbier, 743 So. 2d 1236.
-
State Of Louisiana v. Brian Clarke
La. 2022
9/8/99), (“[T]he first order of business is to look at the language of the statute itself.”).
- State of Louisiana Versus Patrick Plaisance La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana Versus John Tyree La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana Versus Carey Agregaard, IV La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
-
State Of Louisiana Versus
La. 2020
9/8/99), (“[T]he first order of business is to look at the language of the statute itself.”).
- State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
-
State v. Fussell
974 So. 2d 1223
La. 2008
State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), .
-
Derbes v. City of New Orleans
941 So. 2d 45
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
-
Lindy Development, L.L.C. v. Degan
874 So. 2d 252
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), .
-
State v. Patin
842 So. 2d 322
La. 2003
501, 506 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995); see also State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), ("It is well established that the task of statutory construction begins with an examination of the language of the statute itself....
-
Louisiana Horsemen's Ass'n v. Fair Grounds
845 So. 2d 1039
La. 2003
State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99); .
-
State v. Bedford
838 So. 2d 758
La. 2003
State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), .
-
State v. Young
820 So. 2d 1182
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court referred to the word “detained” in Section F, and found that the statute prohibited law enforcement from stopping or detaining a vehicle solely for a violation of La.
-
State v. Benoit
817 So. 2d 11
La. 2002
[3] See State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
-
Farrell v. American Heavy Lift Shipping Co.
805 So. 2d 336
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), .
-
State v. Landry
804 So. 2d 791
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In support of his argument he cites the case of State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the stopping of a motor vehicle for the sole purpose of a violation of La.
-
Board of Trustees v. City of New Orleans
804 So. 2d 751
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
(emphasis add ed) 17As the Louisiana Supreme Court noted, “it is well established that the task of statutory construction begins with an examination of the language of the statute itself,” State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
-
Garrett v. City of Bossier City
792 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
The incident occurred prior to State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.09/08/99), , wherein the supreme court interpreted the seatbelt statute to mean that police officers may not stop a motorist solely for failure to wear a seatbelt.
-
State v. Kennedy
803 So. 2d 916
La. 2001
State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
-
Verbois v. Houston
784 So. 2d 12
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), .
-
State v. Dorsey
779 So. 2d 1008
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court referred to the word "detained" in Section F, and found that the statute prohibited law enforcement from stopping or detaining a vehicle solely for violation of La.R.S.
-
State v. Dupre
775 So. 2d 1173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Notwithstanding the above observation, I agree with the majority that a reversal is required in this case due to the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99); , a case released subsequent to Antoine .
-
State v. Carr
761 So. 2d 1271
La. 2000
State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
-
State v. Elmore
756 So. 2d 1256
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.09/08/99), .
-
State v. Henderson
802 So. 2d 649
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
On remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court, it is apparent that the Fifth Circuit’s opinion, released on December 16, 1998, is not in accord with State v. Barbier, No. 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), and should be reversed.
-
State v. Henderson
750 So. 2d 976
La. 1999
Case remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of State v. Barbier 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .