Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Barbier, 743 So. 2d 1236.

26 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Brian Clarke La. 2022
    9/8/99), (“[T]he first order of business is to look at the language of the statute itself.”).
  • State of Louisiana Versus Patrick Plaisance La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana Versus John Tyree La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana Versus Carey Agregaard, IV La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State Of Louisiana Versus La. 2020
    9/8/99), (“[T]he first order of business is to look at the language of the statute itself.”).
  • State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
  • State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Derbes v. City of New Orleans 941 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Lindy Development, L.L.C. v. Degan 874 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Patin 842 So. 2d 322 La. 2003
    501, 506 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995); see also State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), ("It is well established that the task of statutory construction begins with an examination of the language of the statute itself....
  • Louisiana Horsemen's Ass'n v. Fair Grounds 845 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99); .
  • State v. Bedford 838 So. 2d 758 La. 2003
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court referred to the word “detained” in Section F, and found that the statute prohibited law enforcement from stopping or detaining a vehicle solely for a violation of La.
  • State v. Benoit 817 So. 2d 11 La. 2002
    [3] See State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Farrell v. American Heavy Lift Shipping Co. 805 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Landry 804 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In support of his argument he cites the case of State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the stopping of a motor vehicle for the sole purpose of a violation of La.
  • Board of Trustees v. City of New Orleans 804 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    (emphasis add ed) 17As the Louisiana Supreme Court noted, “it is well established that the task of statutory construction begins with an examination of the language of the statute itself,” State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Garrett v. City of Bossier City 792 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    The incident occurred prior to State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.09/08/99), , wherein the supreme court interpreted the seatbelt statute to mean that police officers may not stop a motorist solely for failure to wear a seatbelt.
  • State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Verbois v. Houston 784 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Dorsey 779 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court referred to the word "detained" in Section F, and found that the statute prohibited law enforcement from stopping or detaining a vehicle solely for violation of La.R.S.
  • State v. Dupre 775 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Notwithstanding the above observation, I agree with the majority that a reversal is required in this case due to the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99); , a case released subsequent to Antoine .
  • State v. Carr 761 So. 2d 1271 La. 2000
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .
  • State v. Elmore 756 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Barbier, 98-2923 (La.09/08/99), .
  • State v. Henderson 802 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    On remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court, it is apparent that the Fifth Circuit’s opinion, released on December 16, 1998, is not in accord with State v. Barbier, No. 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), and should be reversed.
  • State v. Henderson 750 So. 2d 976 La. 1999
    Case remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of State v. Barbier 98-2923 (La.9/8/99), .